Thursday, March 12, 2026

News and Ideas Worth Sharing

HomeViewpointsLettersLet’s have complete...

Let’s have complete financial information at town meeting

In his letter to the editor, John Hart of Stockbridge writes: “We don't often know that the total cost of what we are voting for is not being put before us.” 

To the Editor:

Recent history of town meetings in Stockbridge has proven…. honestly, deceptive.

What does that mean? The attendees at town meetings, with a few exceptions, get caught up in the moment. Vote yes on this article — it’s written and explained that way so….. the vote ends up yes.

What we don’t often know is that the total cost of what we are voting for is not being put before us.

Oh, there is, supposedly, a bidding process and it just gets voted yes. The additional $100,000 here and there that gets added to the project isn’t addressed at Town meeting. The additional funds get approved in later selectman’s meetings (sometimes early Wednesday mornings) Why? Because… the project as approved ran into a snag?

Example, we (or most) were “sold” by a Selectman at the time, J. Christopher Irsfeld, on moving Town Hall from Procter Hall to Plain School. An enormously expensive project that I and others objected to because of the invisible taxpayer cost. That, along with no concrete reuse plan for Procter Hall, was an absurd vote. He was good at theatrics and salesmanship and it all was bought and is still being paid for by the Stockbridge taxpayers. The majority were bamboozled and voted for it, so it goes, eh? It continues to bleed our town coffers. Good sales job, bad results. The 2nd beginning to our current financial worries. The Plain and middle school construction came first.

Now, we have the new Monument Mountain maintenance/rebuild and “Shared Expenses” issues with other towns before us shortly.

Shared expenses? Like Police? No! Like Town Administrator? No! Do our selectmen ask the head’s of these departments their opinion or just make blind decisions on their own?

Share winter salt and sand expenses? Yes! Equipment? Yes!

We can be deceptively presented “short viewed” decisions like the Procter Hall to Plain School project — very expensive decisions, or we can ask our Finance Committee and Selectman to answer very dicey questions? Questions like: Before you come to us with the “sum of money” articles, can we get a solid bid on the project’s cost to put it before the taxpayers and voters? If it is quoted to be beyond our wishes, can we revisit the issue in a Special Town Meeting? Can’t do that? Don’t put it before us until “the sum of money” question can be definitively answered.

John H. Hart

Rattlesnake Mountain Rd

Stockbridge, Mass.

The writer is occasionally referred to as leader of “The Rattlesnake Gang.”

spot_img

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.

Continue reading

Why should second-home owners in Great Barrington subsidize well-off full-time residents?

Even if they won't be receiving a reduction, primary residents of means would still benefit from a system that levies higher taxes on second-home owners but not on them.

Bard College President Botstein’s continued leadership is no longer tenable

When someone has held power for nearly half a century, it can become easy to confuse longevity with legitimacy, or position with immunity. But tenure is not a substitute for trust.

To those who attended the Lee Greener Gateway Committee’s free Repair Fair, this is why we live in the Berkshires

In these troubled times, it was refreshing to bask awhile in this generous sharing of time, talent, and good will.

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.