Wednesday, March 18, 2026

News and Ideas Worth Sharing

HomeViewpointsLettersApples to oranges:...

Apples to oranges: 100 Bridge Street to Pinewoods

In his letter to the editor, Bobby Houston writes: “It is highly cynical of CDC to compare their [100 Bridge Street] project to Pinewoods in Stockbridge.”

To the Editor:

As the CDC marches toward permitting 45 affordable units at 100 Bridge St, they keep pointing to Pinewoods in Stockbridge as an example of how nice their project will be. I’m really concerned, because what the CDC (Community Development Corporation of South Berkshire) is promoting sure looks like tall high-density apartment blocks over a parking lot slammed up against a waste treatment plant.

Community vegetable garden at Pinewoods. Photo: Bobby Houston
Community vegetable garden at Pinewoods. Photo: Bobby Houston

So I stopped at Pinewoods today and had a look.

Can I just say: It is highly cynical of CDC to compare their project to Pinewoods.

Pinewoods is only two-thirds the size, on 3 times the acreage. Pinewoods is 100 yards away from a waste treatment plant that is one-half the size of Barrington’s, with a forest buffer in between. The rest of the campus borders open space with wetlands and hayfields.

Pinewoods is mid-density, with a dozen small detached duplexes, covered parking for all, big community house, playground and BIG community vegetable gardens.

So, in comparison: more amenities, much more space, smaller scale, lower density. And, of course, no brownfield or polluted river.

It is the definition of a garden suburb, nothing like the CDC’s proposal for high-density housing blocks –stacked over a parking lot — on a brownfield — right next to a waste treatment plant.

Apples and oranges, people. In this case, rotten apples.

Bobby Houston

Great Barrington

spot_img

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.

Continue reading

Why I’m participating in the No Kings national mobilization

We can stop Trump. To do so we need to keep reminding him and his MAGA loyalists that we live in a constitutional democracy, not a monarchy.

Donald Trump’s failed presidency

Trump was elected because people relied on the promises he made, but curbing inflation; lowering the high costs of food, gas, and electricity; improving access to healthcare; and restoring affordability have basically been ignored.

Why should second-home owners in Great Barrington subsidize well-off full-time residents?

Even if they won't be receiving a reduction, primary residents of means would still benefit from a system that levies higher taxes on second-home owners but not on them.

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.