To the editor:
I guess it’s time to get deeper into this Stockbridge RTE thing (also known as the Residential Tax Exemption). First, how do I stand on the matter? I’m in favor of implementing it — at least for one year so we have some real data regarding how it works(ed). I also must say here that as a member of the town’s Conservation Commission I am in no way speaking for that entity.
Here’s why. I recently attended an assessor’s meeting. During that meeting our head assessor declared he has never seen the assessed values of homes in Stockbridge rise by so much. Averaged at 13 percent for 2023. Do those calculations to find out what your property taxes will be for next year.
Why does that happen? There are a number of reasons but the primary one is what people have paid for homes like yours for sale in Stockbridge. We all know that COVID caused mass abandonment of city dwellers in metro areas. Then, those folks, with considerable resources us Stockbridgeians do not have came to town and got into bidding wars with fellow buyers. If they really wanted the house, and it was for sale for $350,000 they’d offer $400,000 cash. Deal done – town property assessments go up.
Why else am I for the RTE? Being a member of our Conservation Commission I have an opportunity to see most if not all building projects in town. Here’s why that is relevant: Someone owns a small cottage and they want to improve it. In my experience they are not just updating the kitchen or baths. They are tearing the entire cottage down and building, what I call, monuments to money in their place. Bam! Tax assessments go up. Folks, these are not you and me, the voters and residents of our town, these are… second homeowners driving up our property taxes.
There’s the issue of division between second homeowners and voters. Really? I’m not sure that holds a heck of a lot of water. Example: The Stockbridge Bowl Association (made up close to 100 percent second home owners) sued the Town and the Conservation Commission and I might add, each member, over dumping defoliant chemicals (like agent orange) into the lake. We protested, they sued and cost the town a fair amount in legal fees. Division!? They drew that line already. I have absolutely no problem drawing the next line. The RTE.
Please urge our Select board to reconsider their recent straw vote on this issue. Ask them why they think it’s not a good idea. Also there is a petition being circulated in town for those in favor to sign. More than 100 signatures so far and counting.
John H. Hart
Stockbridge