• Local
  • Pittsfield, MA
  • more weather >
Heather Bellow
Vito Valentini, chair of the SBRSD School Committee's finance subcommittee, gestures toward the budget sheets that miscalculated the assessments for the five district towns. Behind him are School Committee members Arthur Batacchi Jr. of Sheffield, Charles Flynn of Egremont, and Dick Sears of Sheffield.`

Southern Berkshire Regional School Committee: Town assessments incorrect, budget slashed

More Info
By Thursday, Oct 1, 2015 News 9

 Sheffield — School Committee members said an innocent computational spreadsheet error in the amount charged to each of the five towns for its share of payments to the Southern Berkshire Regional School District (SBRSD) has thrown off the numbers for this fiscal year, resulting in some towns having been overcharged, others undercharged. The result: a political and financial mess.

The SBRSD Finance Subcommittee, not wasting time in revealing and sorting out the tangle, invited town officials from each of the five towns in the district to an emergency meeting Wednesday (September 30), at which Chairman Vito Valentini explained what happened, and came up with a proposed solution.

Officials from the five SBRSD member towns at the emergency meeting that disclosed assessment errors. Photo: Heather Bellow

Officials from the five SBRSD member towns at the emergency meeting that disclosed assessment errors. Photo: Heather Bellow

The school committee will be officially informed at its Thursday (October 1) meeting.

School assessments, Valentini explained, begin with “very complicated formulas” from the state; each town’s amount is then computed by the district, using the percent that each town must pay. The mistake in this case was that someone simply used one column of very close percentages instead of another — both columns are right next to each other on the form that is used when the final budget is created.

“We have a glitch,” Valentini said. “The numbers are not that great, but a percentage of one or two percent, when you’re dealing with a lot of money, becomes a lot of money.”

The glitch was discovered by School Committee member H. Dennis Sears, Valentini said.

Egremont was overcharged $161,164; Monterey, $119,936.

Alford and New Marlborough were undercharged $1,549 and $39,979 respectively. Sheffield, the largest town with the most students in the district, was undercharged $239,871.

Vito Valentini proposes a grand bargain to rectify the assessment errors

Vito Valentini proposes a grand bargain to rectify the assessment errors

Valentini, a former math teacher, came up with a solution — doing hand calculations, he said — that would involve the district essentially eating the difference over several years.

“I’ve been beating my head against the wall for three days to figure out how we can make this work,” he said, noting that the “worst possible mess up” would be if under assessed towns would “have to go back to town meetings.”

So, Valentini said, to avoid carnage in education and other programs, he and Superintendent David Hastings found a way. “Here’s where we’re getting like Solomon,” Valentini said.

Hastings searched the school budget and found a way to reduce the budget by $216,193 because of retirements that led to several vacancies, or a classroom that didn’t need to be filled, Valentini said. This left a figure of roughly $126,000 from Sheffield’s under assessment, that still has to be paid.

The district, backed by its lawyers, is proposing a “grand bargain.”

“For New Marlborough and Alford it was very little money,” Valentini said, “and with the reduction they will see that much less assessed. If the towns of Egremont and or Monterey, who have already approved huge amounts of money — if you would be open to a grand bargain where you guys would forward the money this year for credits in the next 2 years, then we would have a deal.”

“The point of the deal,” Hastings said, “is to make up the $126,000.”

In order to do that, the district proposes that it eat roughly $40,000 per year for three years.

“We’re going to spread this pain over a couple more years,” Sears said, “and share the $126,000 to make Sheffield whole, with us taking the hit that we’re going to take.”

New Marlborough and Alford will not be assessed for their smaller undercharged amounts, Valentini said.

But, Sears said, “we don’t have to change anything if that’s what the towns want to do.”

“Why can’t all of the towns do this over a long period of time so that no one feels the pinch,” said Monterey Selectboard member Scott Jenssen.

“Somebody has to make up the $126,000, otherwise the budget will be short that amount,” Valentini said.

Chareles Flynn, left, listens as Dick Sears explains how the assessment error was discovered.

Chareles Flynn, left, listens as Dick Sears explains how the assessment error was discovered. Photo: Heather Bellow

There are some repercussions.

“We as a district aren’t going to have any cushion to speak of over the next several years,” Sears said. “The district is already taking a hit and will continue to take hits down the line.”

Not to mention the discomfort town officials said they would have bringing this back to their residents. Jenssen wondered how to tell people “we just gave the school district a loan without any interest.”

The first payments for fiscal 2016 were made August 1. The next are due November 1.

In the end it was decided that all the towns’ selectboards and finance committees would come up with a proposal which would be brought back to the district in one larger meeting. Valentini explained that his committee can only make suggestions about how to fix this — they can’t tell towns what to do. And Sears wanted it extra clear: “We’re not saying we messed it up, you guys go fix it for us.”

School Committee Chairman Carl Stewart told The Edge that this was a “one-off” mistake, and that the district “checked to make sure it wasn’t systemic.”

But Stewart said that in these fiery times for school budgets, he hoped that political factors wouldn’t flare over this mechanical error, and that the district’s willingness to eat the difference might soften any pain. “We don’t want to pour oil in the waters of what will be another fight in the budget process,” he said, adding that the district is planning to “institute something that reduces the probability of this happening again.”

Valentini’s motion to reduce the district’s budget by $216,000 was unanimous, and will be brought to the School Committee for the same vote on Thursday (October 1).

“I can’t apologize enough for the fact that this mistake was made,” Sears said. “It’s an example of what seems a minor little glitch that can create a lot of problems.”

“As soon as we discovered it we brought it forward,” Valentini added.

More by »

9 Comments   Add Comment

  1. GMHeller says:

    No one in Berkshire County wants to admit that the great ‘centralized school district’ experiment has been a huge failure.
    It’s been a fiscal and educational disaster for decades, since the very beginning.
    Long overdue is the total dissolution of SBRSD so that the present member towns can go back to building and maintaining schools within each respective town.
    Control of budgets, hiring, and curricula would be back in the hands of the voters in each town where such decisions belong.
    Other benefits: Transportation costs would be slashed along with the amount of time wasted daily in just getting to school.
    Overall savings would be enormous.

  2. Patrick Fennell says:

    Hope the kids don’t take the same math that the school administrators practice. So when will someone get canned for this fiasco?

  3. Mark says:

    I watch kids getting on buses at 6:30 a.m. for classes that begin at 9:00 a.m. It is an epic fail on many levels these “centralized” schools.

  4. BILL says:

    How about the empty buses and the mini-vans full of kids every day on the way to school and back again. Every town and city through the whole country! Imagine what we could save.

  5. Mr G 8811 says:

    In theory I agree with Mr. heller. However, the inequities created due to the wide economic disparities between towns in the Berkshires would be difficult. Educating children, whether transporting them or not, is not cheap. In the Berkshire Hills district, for example, prior to the building of Muddy Brook, the Housatonic school was woefully underfunder while the Plain School afforded many programs Housatonic could not, and the education, and the kids relative outcomes suffered. Now, that was funded by a centrally administered district even then, but I wonder how, say, the village of Housatonic, or Alford or Monterey which are much wealthier, would administer and operate a K-12 . I also believe that the duplication of administrative services paid for by each little town would eat up any savings from transportation. Every little town paying for administrator, principal, business manager, SPED, etc. is sort of silly.mthere would still need to be some sort of cooperation.

  6. Carl Stewart says:

    Wonderful to have people who know nothing about the problems with rising costs and declining student numbers be so eager to offer opinions that have absolutely no rational basis or serious thought behind them It is particularly irresponsible for Mr. Heller, who resides many hundreds of miles from Berkshire County to spew his unmitigated nonsense in a public forum. He has the right to do so, but he is exercising that right poorly.

    The fact is that if Berkshire Hills was to “decentralize”, i.e., have each of the 3 towns in the district run K-12 schools, the quality of education in 2 of those towns would decline significantly. Likewise, in Southern Berkshire, the only 1 of the 5 towns in the district that might be able to sustain a school system is Sheffield. Alford, one of those 5 towns, currently has about 20 students in the Southern Berkshire system. Does Mr. Heller have a viable plan for operating a school in Alford with 1.8 students in each grade? Of course he doesn’t and he doesn’t care that his ideas are ludicrous.

    Mr. Fennell thinks a head (or two) should roll because of this very human error. And what will that achieve? Talking heads have been around for decades but there is usually something more than sawdust between their ears. In this case, not so much

    1. Carl Stewart says:

      Is that Mr. Heller’s response…a letter he wrote to the Editor of The Berkshire Eagle spouting the same nonsense that he’s been talking about whenever he pontificates about schools and the “benefits” of decentralization? I’ve invited him to attend a meeting or 2 of the Berkshire County Education Task Force to give us the benefit of his knowledge on this subject. Anyone who has been reading his comments will understand why he hasn’t responded to the invitation. Let’s see some numbers Mr. Heller on why your approach would be better, rather than mere conclusory opinions without any support

      1. GMHeller says:

        Carl Stewart:
        According to Albert Einstein, Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
        Simply moving the deck chairs on this overpriced, bureaucratized Titanic is not going to create a better school system nor better educational product; the centralized school model was flawed from the start.
        De-centralizing works; it cuts management as well as transportation expenses while returning back to the voters of the respective towns real control over the individual school budgets where such control belongs.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.