• Local
  • El Paso, Texas
  • more weather >
David Scribner
The former Housatonic Elementary School overlooks the playground in center of the village of Housatonic. The school's playground and lawn create what amounts to the village green.

Selectmen to negotiate public-private partnership for reuse of Housatonic School

More Info
By Tuesday, Oct 17, 2017 News 12

Great Barrington — The redevelopment of the empty Housatonic School is one step closer to becoming a reality, but many questions remain after the selectboard voted unanimously Monday night (August 16) to give town manager Jennifer Tabakin the authority to negotiate with Grayhouse Partners on an agreement for the reuse of the building.

Grayhouse CEO Bill Nappo made a presentation to the board in which he and his team explained the unusual arrangement, dubbed a “public-private partnership” (P3), which is a contractual arrangement between a public agency such as the town and a private sector entity such as Grayhouse. P3s are often used for toll roads but can include projects such as the Housatonic School, said Grayhouse consultant Gregory Fitch of Provident Economic Technologies.

Financial consultant Gillette Conner explains the proposal to the Great Barrington Selectboard as Gregory Fitch of Provident Economic Technologies, at left, and Grayhouse CEO Bill Nappo, at right, listen. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Under the Great Barrington arrangement, as described by Fitch, the town would retain ownership of the building and Grayhouse would lease it from the town.

Grayhouse will have one year to perform what it called “due diligence” on the property. That will include establishing funding sources along with the costs of design, construction and operations.

“A public-private partnership could be a means of addressing the economic and social responsibility aspects of the project,” said Grayhouse financial consultant Gillette Conner. “We want the school to become the heart of the village.”

But, Connor added, “You can’t just do well; you have to do it in an economically viable way. What are the usages and funding streams that make this viable and not be a drain on the tax base of the town?”

Connor then answered her own question: The project would be funded locally through a combination of private equity and lenders, including project-finance debt. In addition, Grayhouse will seek funding through private philanthropy and it could take advantage of historic tax credits, private activity bonds and grants.

“We want to do it well and do it local,” Connor said.

Sent out this spring, the town’s most recent request for proposals elicited only Grayhouse’s. RFPs soliciting potential buyers or others who would want to use the Housatonic School were sent out in 2010 and again in 2012. More than two years ago, the town sent out another RFP but nothing came of it.

Connor emphasized that Grayhouse wanted to preserve the historical character of the building: “We’re planning to maintain the integrity and feel of the building. We’re not going to make it into some big loading dock … We have skin in the game. We want to make this a productive asset.”

As presented, the project would convert the school into seven small apartments and several work spaces on three levels. Connor conceded that parking could be an issue.

The adjacent Housie Dome, which now functions as a community center and contains the former school’s gymnasium, will not be a part of the deal. Nor was the school’s playground, which is now a town park, marketed as part of a potential sale. So in any adaptive reuse of the building, the Housie Dome spots could not be used for parking, though the proposal does add 14 new parking spots on the east side of the building that encroach slightly on the playground.

“This is a fairly flexible site,” explained Grayhouse architect Steve McAlister. “There are lots of things it can be used for, so we are not necessarily constrained to what we are showing here.”

Architect Steve McAlister of Clark & Green reviews the proposed design of project. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Connor said Grayhouse would produce timely communication and provide the selectmen with monthly progress reports on the project and “what happens in due diligence process.”

In its response to the RFP, Grayhouse, which is based in Housatonic, says interested commercial tenants include software executive Jeffrey Blaugrund, now the owner of Braise Worthy, a food preparation start-up. There was also a letter of support from Berkshire Bank.

In addition, Connor said the group has had conversations with Rep. William “Smitty” Pignatelli and Sen. Adam Hinds and the project has “their early support.” Grayhouse has also met with representatives from the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission. The selectmen were, by and large, pleased enough with the proposal.

“They’re willing to really dig in here,” said Sean Stanton, who chairs the selectboard. “We’d like to see some progress.”

Yet Stanton also cautioned that the town would be assuming some risk and that entering into the partnership with Grayhouse doesn’t come without some expense. He added that, “We’ve had people come in with RFPs and they tell us all these wonderful things they want to do and it turns out they couldn’t do it.”

Gregory Fitch of Provident Economic Technologies educates the Great Barrington Selectboard about public-private partnerships. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Furthermore, Stanton said the project would not be without costs to the town since paid town staff would surely be putting in hours as part of the partnership. Still, he acknowledged that, “This is probably our best option.”

“But what if we have nothing after a year?” asked Selectman Dan Bailly, who lives in Housatonic and has taken an active interest in the fate of the school. “We will have lost all that time.”

Fitch countered that, even if the project never gets off the ground, town officials will be far “better educated” about the building and about the value of P3s.

Before becoming a selectman in 2013, Bailly was on one of the task forces charged with recommending options for reuse of the school. Those options, presented to the selectboard in August 2011, were to use the building through a public-private partnership, turn it into a town community center, or tear it down and replace it with a larger park. Bailly has said, however, that surveys consistently found that Housatonic residents did not want the building to be used for housing.

“We’ve put out a detailed RFP and this is the only one we got,” said Selectman Steve Bannon. “They are only proposing due diligence at this point. This is a time-invested plan that hopefully will bear some fruit … We could put out another RFP but how did that work out?”

“If we had another option then this would be a harder decision,” said Selectman Ed Abrahams.

Bailly remained skeptical about the project because of the lack of specifics but conceded there are currently no better options. Bannon said if there was no housing in the proposal, then the school might have to be demolished.

In the end, the selectmen voted without dissent to authorize Tabakin to negotiate a memorandum of understanding with Grayhouse that establishes the parameters of the relationship and report back to the board within 30 days.

More by »

12 Comments   Add Comment

  1. Jim, Lodge says:

    So….to make a long story short, Grayhouse wants to convert the building into seven apartments and possible mixed use work or retail space, ya?

  2. John says:

    Government should not be in the landlord business. Period. Surly, the taxpayer will see their dollars supporting this in some way. Arent taxes high enough?
    Sell it for a dollar and be done with it.

  3. kritterz says:

    And we all know what a fine job the board and town manager have done with other town owned real estate. The firehouse…Searles school

    1. Brian says:

      Instead of hiding behind an on-line pseudonym and dishing out cheap criticism, perhaps you could run for office and devote your time to improving the community? This is the best option the Town has received and the commercial spaces could provide jobs for local residents. Kudos to the Selectboard and Ms Tabakin.

      1. Pete says:

        Agree, how much are we paying to keep this place idle and unusable? It is likewise costing tax dollars for something that just sits there and deteriorates.

  4. Ed Abrahams says:

    First a correction. I said that if we had another offer this would be a harder decision, not an easier one. But we didn’t have another offer, not even for $1 as “John” suggests. Is John willing to buy it for a dollar and assume the clean-up or demo costs? If so, he didn’t submit a proposal. The town should be thanking the applicants, and I did thank them at the meeting.

    Since no one offered us any money, the building is apparently a liability. It is estimated that it will cost $700,000 to demolish it, an old estimate, and then it is still not generating any income. It may yet come to that, but $700,000 is a lot of money to pay for some parking or a better sledding hill.

    What we have in front of us is an offer to see if a use can be found that makes it worth more than negative $700,000. The offer was made by local residents who are willing to put in a year of work for free. At the end of the year we can accept their suggestion and negotiate with them, or we can say thank you and try to come up with something better.

    If anyone has a better offer, you have a year to figure it out.

    1. Terry Cowgill says:

      Thanks Ed. Quote has been fixed. Makes more sense in that context anyway.

    2. John says:

      Put it up for advertised auction, $1 dollar.
      Full disclosure, full liability without 1,000 strings attached.
      Keep it simple.

  5. Michelle Loubert says:

    It would have been nice if more than a handful of Housatonic residents had been in the room to listen to the proposal presentation and speak with the people presenting it. I was dismayed to see only a handful show up. Housatonic residents, regardless of the issue, need to have a presence in the room during duscussions. It does make a difference.

    1. Michelle Loubert says:

      Sorry.. typing on cell phone…should be “discussions.” Sorry for the typo!

  6. Michelle Loubert says:

    Watch the progress on this closely. Perhaps this will inspire looking into a public/private partnership between Housatonic Water Works and the Town.

  7. Lauren says:

    I’m sorry I missed this meeting. I am with Dan on this one.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.