REVIEW: BTG’s ‘At Home at the Zoo’ enhances, honors Albee’s text

More Info
By Thursday, Aug 3 Arts & Entertainment
Emma Rothenberg-Ware
Joey Collins and David Adkins in the Berkshire Theatre Group production of Edward Albee's 'At Home at the Zoo' at the Unicorn Theatre in Stockbridge, Massachusetts.
At Home at the Zoo

By Edward Albee

Directed by Eric Hill

Berkshire Theatre Group’s production of Edward Albee’s “At Home at the Zoo” is one of those rare occasions where the production not only is accurate to but also enhances the playwright’s text. Sounds like an obvious goal of a director, but it’s a notion curiously out of fashion these days with so many van Hove wannabes hell-bent on self-indulgent, director-driven, re-conceptions of venerable, well-known texts. Observing – or honoring – the playwright’s work sounds simple, too, but it’s not, especially with a playwright like Edward Albee. In the interest of transparency, I acknowledge that I‘ve worked at Berkshire Theatre Group with both director Eric Hill – on “The Homecoming” two seasons ago – and the cast members. What’s presented on the Unicorn Stage in its productions of “At Home at the Zoo” under Hill’s –appropriately – invisible hand are Albee’s power, complexity and probity not just intact, but also invigorated. Paired here as Albee intended, “Homelife” and “The Zoo Story” emerge as a seamless, unified drama with impeccably cadenced performances by David Adkins, Tara Franklin and Joey Collins.

David Adkins and Tara Franklin in the Berkshire Theatre Group production of Edward Albee's 'At Home at the Zoo (Zoo Story).' Photo: Emma Rothenberg-Ware

David Adkins and Tara Franklin in the Berkshire Theatre Group production of Edward Albee’s ‘At Home at the Zoo (Zoo Story).’ Photo: Emma Rothenberg-Ware

“The Zoo Story,” the second act, was Albee’s first play, written in 1958. It’s about a lot of things but the action is a conversation between two strangers: Peter – played by David Adkins – a successful, middle-aged, textbook-publishing executive; and Jerry – Joey Collins – a forlorn and lonely stranger in Central Park. Albee wrote the first act, “Homelife,” a “prequel,” in 2004. It, too, is about a lot of things, but the action is a conversation between Peter and his wife, Ann, in their Upper East Side apartment that takes place before his visit in the park. When first produced in Berlin in 1961 and then New York in 1963, “The Zoo Story” was shocking, daring, bold, edgy – experimental even. It’s still all that, except experimental: it paved the way for so much theater that followed it. The story of “Homelife” is ostensibly conventional: much of the conversation centers on Peter and Ann’s marriage, though, like the rest of Albee’s work (especially “The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?”), there’s nothing conventional about topics Albee brings up. The themes that Albee links between the two plays converge, with the acute sensitivity of this production, as a continuum, although – paradoxically as David Adkins has observed – Albee could not have written “The Zoo Story” with its daring, raw energy as an older person, nor could he have written – with its contemplative matured view – “Homelife” as l’enfant terrible.

Territory – and the natural instinct to defend it – spatially defines action in both plays, even if that territory, for Peter in their affluent Manhattan apartment, is as comfortable and mundane as a modern armchair and, for Ann, its matching sofa. The first line, Ann’s  “We should talk,” establishes a necessity to communicate. As Peter and Ann’s conversation evolves – evolution indeed – Albee’s setting up the question about the utility of superimposing thought over feeling, almost as a proscription of primitive nature. Albee’s doing far more than testing the limits of marriage or even spousal communication. What’s love got to do with it? Peter worries about his penis, Ann about her breasts. Peter confesses a college incident that involves bloody physical injury. Talk turns to pets, a pair of cats and a pair of parakeets – innocent enough but animals all the same.

Joey Collins and David Adkins in the Berkshire Theatre Group production of Edward Albee's 'At Home at the Zoo (Zoo Story).' Photo: Emma Rothenberg-Ware

Joey Collins and David Adkins in the Berkshire Theatre Group production of Edward Albee’s ‘At Home at the Zoo (Zoo Story).’ Photo: Emma Rothenberg-Ware

From the get-go, Adkins and Franklin establish the rhythms in Albee’s language, almost metronomically incorporating Pinter-light pauses all synchronized with movement as they stalk around the living room set. (Who’s hunting whom?) Franklin’s best moments are the most challenging when she maintains the beat while negotiating some radical emotional shifts. Adkins, in a remarkable performance that is both controlled and vulnerable – like Peter – quickly establishes Peter as a civilized man of intellect and privilege surviving very comfortably, if not altogether peaceably, in a civilized world.

The precepts about his world that Peter assumes and the territory he claims – a park bench in Act Two – gets challenged beginning with the benign, tentative approach of Jerry, a forlorn and lonely stranger who lives in a boarding house on the West Side and who’s just visited the park’s zoo. The act starts off with Jerry, played with foreboding enigma by Joey Collins, a safe distance from the bench, but eventually he paces around the bench, hovering over Peter. (Who’s hunting whom? again). In an amazing nearly 20-minute monologue that continues precisely the rhythms of language established by Adkins and Franklin in Act One, Collins completes a portrait of an intelligent, injured soul alienated from the world. Jerry, like Ann, needs to communicate, to tell his “zoo story,” his visit to see animals – animals, again – but meanders, obsessing about his landlady’s dog – an animal, again. Does Jerry’s need to communicate conform to Peter’s capacity to understand or vice versa?

Jerry divulges unsettling aspects of his own life: his curiosity about Peter’s is intrusive, then threatening. Disturbance mounts. When Peter and Jerry really contact, do instincts prevail? How does Peter engage with Jerry, or does he disengage (fight or flight indeed)? What’s thought got to do with it?

What’s most engaging about Albee is, just when one thinks one might – emphasis on “might” – have figured him out, he reveals more. In these two plays, both action and theme in “Homelife” come around in “The Zoo Story” to an unforgettable, shocking climax that lands with a punch to the gut. “At Home at the Zoo” at Berkshire Theatre Group combines text, direction and acting that make real theatre real, the kind of dramatic wholeness people in theatre aspire to but seldom achieve as well as here.


At Home at the Zoo plays on the Larry Vaber Stage in the Unicorn Theatre. 6 East St., Stockbridge, Massachusetts, through Saturday, Aug. 26. For information and tickets, see the Berkshire Edge calendar, call the box office at (413) 997-4444 or go online to

Return Home

Read More from

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.

A NOVEL: ‘Over the Edge,’ Chapter 4

Sunday, Feb 18 - Her schooling in Switzerland was academic enough. Not only could she walk balancing a book on her head, she read the books she balanced. That was a prerequisite.

Mastheads: Summoning Berkshires’ literary landscape

Wednesday, Feb 14 - Founded in 2016 upon the legacy of five American Renaissance authors who wrote in Pittsfield, the Mastheads is at once an urban architectural experiment, a literary research initiative, a writers’ residency and an educational program.