• Local
  • Pittsfield, MA
  • more weather >
Jenny Clark
A 200-year-old maple tree on Mahaiwe Street in Great Barrington may be in danger due to plans for a nearby apartment complex.

Public invited to discuss fate of historic maple tree in Great Barrington

More Info
By Wednesday, Apr 10, 2019 Letters 8

To the editor:

Is anyone interested in preserving a 200-year-old maple tree on Mahaiwe Street?

There is a majestic maple on town property on the Mahaiwe side of the empty lot at 546 South Main St. in Great Barrington. It’s a healthy, nonhazardous, heritage tree in remarkably good health considering it has not been cared for (fed, pruned or protected).

TOPA Enterprises plans to build an apartment complex there with a driveway and parking area that will kill the tree, which has a drip line showing a root system that stretches 50 feet or more into the privately owned lot.

Final site plan review by the planning board is scheduled for this Thursday, April 11, at Town Hall at 7 p.m. The agenda can be found by clicking here.

The planning board has asked the developers to indicate what they plan to do with all of the trees on the property. If the chair, Brandee Nelson, gives permission, citizens may be able to speak regarding the disposal of this tree, which is on public property but would be damaged to death by construction on the private lot.

Both town tree warden Michael Peretti and town arborist Eric Haupt have found the maple to be healthy and nonhazardous. They recommend waiting until the tree fully leafs out at the end of May to give their final evaluations. This plan for a short delay could be encouraged to the planning board.

The Great Barrington Tree Committee endorses protecting this historic tree contingent on the recommendation of the tree warden.

Preserve or remove—however you feel, please consider attending this meeting to participate in this important decision.

Holly Hamer
Great Barrington

The writer is the chair of the Great Barrington Tree Committee.

8 Comments   Add Comment

  1. Laura C says:

    OMG!!! he owns the property, he should be able to do what he wants with the tree. Why the need to get so many involved?

    1. Lauren says:

      The tree is on town property, not private property.

      1. Shawn P. Leary says:

        The trunk of the tree actually straddles private and public property; 50% is owned by TOPA Enterprises, and 50% is owned by the town.

  2. Marc says:

    It shows a lack of ingenuity. To lose such an old specimen because time hasn’t been taken to create a smarter plan that allows for both the needed construction and preservation of an irreplaceable tree is shortsighted.

  3. Lois Reynolds says:

    oh…..save the tree….can’t be replaced for 200 yrs…..

  4. concerned says:

    SAVE THE TREE!!!!!!!

  5. Folderol Pennyword says:

    Don’t be ridiculous. Save the damn tree. For all of our sake’s!

  6. Nat G. says:

    I think saving the tree, especially if it’s healthy, would be nice to have around. Is it really that difficult to save one single tree? I think not.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.