• Local
  • Pittsfield, MA
  • more weather >
David Scribner
Crosby Elementary School on the West Side of Pittsfield, where 72 percent of the students come from families in poverty.

Pittsfield’s forgotten, ‘underidentified’ community: Children living in poverty

More Info
By Monday, Sep 25, 2017 News 8

Pittsfield — The Oxford dictionary’s first entry under “community” is: A group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common. I got to thinking recently about how we define community after reading reference to the word within letters and articles covering the Berkshire Museum’s proposed sale of artwork. Protestors bemoan the museum’s lack of “community support” for their plans, in which case there seems to be something of a disconnect at work here.

Berkshire Museum is located on South Street in downtown Pittsfield, where, within a one-mile radius, there are three community schools educating more than 1,000 children. Crosby Community School is 72 percent poor, and Morningside Community School is 75 percent poor, and Conte Community School is 79 percent poor. There are more than 900 kids living in poverty in the neighborhoods immediately surrounding the museum.

The Berkshire Museum on South Street in Pittsfield.

Pittsfield was in the news last spring for a different reason than the potential “tremendous loss” of paintings, to quote one recent black-veiled protester. With rising costs and losses to tax rolls, Pittsfield Public Schools (PPS) eliminated 73 staff positions. Unlike the Berkshire Museum story, these tremendous cuts were in the news one day, and out the next. School personnel have to roll with unpredictable punches, and no one wants to dwell on what’s missing.

To find out more about how the city was handling these losses, my friend Maria Rundle, Executive Director at Flying Cloud Institute, which provides STEM programming for many of Pittsfield’s students, suggested I speak to Judy Rush, Curriculum Director for PPS, who kindly carved out a few minutes one morning while assessing incoming students at Reid Middle School.

Actually, Ms. Rush’ official title is misleading, and tells only one quarter of the story. She is now Curriculum Director, Title 1 Director, foster care Coordinator and Coordinator of new teachers and mentors. When I suggested that these sounded like four full-time positions, she replied, with no trace of bitterness, “Yes, each of these jobs would be separate in another district.” She is refreshingly positive, modeling the optimism she says her teachers have to teach many kids, since optimism is a learned trait, and there’s not much of it to be found in many poor households.

With the PPS administration, as she puts it, “at a bare minimum,” she sees her own juggling act not as absurd overwork but an opportunity. “What’s exciting is that this allows me to empower educators to make decisions. That’s the advantage of having one person doing all these jobs.”

The Pittsfield Schools administration office on First Street in Pittsfield. Photo: David Scribner

The biggest challenges for all her staff, of course, are the ravages of poverty. “The kids come to us having experienced traumas. The way we address that is through Inclusive Practices, which teaches us how to design every activity with all the student variables in mind. Instead of teaching something, and saying, ‘These are the kids who will get it, and these are the ones who won’t,’ we anticipate who will need what, and plan accordingly, so we meet each learner’s needs at the outset. Learning [through the Inclusive Practices training] how the human mind behaves ‘on poverty’ was one big a-ha moment for us.”

Rush says, referring to the seventy-three cuts, she believes only two or three people ended up without any position, thanks to early retirements. Referring to one aspect of her own expanded role, she says, “The foster care piece is new, and is the result of new ESSA [Every Student Succeeds Act] regulations. Before it was absorbed into what the principal and guidance counselors handled. We’ve just started to keep records of foster kids this year. They are an underidentified group.”

ESSA was the Obama administration’s signature education initiative, and like so many other well-meaning federal mandates, came down from above with lots of new requirements but no new resources to meet them. ESSA was preceded by George Bush’ No Left Child Behind, which, in turn, ushered in the era of high-stakes testing.

As for the current administration’s education priorities, the future does not seem to be getting any brighter for the people who serve the country’s poorest kids. For the 2017-18 school year, PPS received their Title 1 funding, which is the largest pot of anti-poverty support for public schools, and have also received Title 2-a funding for teachers’ professional development. But, Rush says, “That is solid for this year, but Title 2-a has been thrown out as possibly on the chopping block, and even Title 1 has been talked about too.”

Morningside Elementary School in Pittsfield. Photo: David Scribner

The Trump administration released its education budget proposals in late May, seeking cuts of over $9 billion. Betsy DeVos, Education Secretary, called the proposal, “an historic investment in America’s students.” This investment would involve the reallocation of one billion from Title 1 toward school choice. (Also recommended for elimination in the President’s budget is the only federally-funded afterschool program in the country, 21st Century Community Learning Centers, which serves hundreds of students at Conte, Morningside, Reid and Herberg Middle Schools, and Pittsfield High School.)

Title 1 goes back to LBJ’s war on poverty, when it provided federal funds to local school budgets. These days, schools that have 40 percent or greater poverty are eligible for funding above and beyond what a district could provide. Rush told me, “In our case, Title 1 funds provide reading coaches and interventionists schools, and we’ve also paid math coaches. But as the Title 1 grant goes down, or stays level, salaries go up, so each year there is less money there.”

As for municipal funding in Pittsfield, the situation is, of course, more dire in the short term. Karen Vogel, Director of Community Impact at the Berkshire United Way, says, “The city is reaching their ceiling for the tax levy.” And when 73 positions are lost, it’s the students who require the most time and attention who are hurt, Vogel pointed out. “All our schools are having to make some really hard decisions, which unfortunately, fell most upon our paraprofessionals, the ones that work most closely with our students.”

Chapter 70 funding, the state level funding sent to school districts across Massachusetts, is not adequate either, according to State Representative Tricia Farley-Bouvier. “Chapter 70 funding formula isn’t right. We are not in as much trouble as other school systems in county, but we do have declining enrollment, and the funding doesn’t reflect the needs that we have.”

In related state news, on the ballot for November, 2018 is the Fair Share Amendment, which would raise income tax on those earning more than $1,000,000 per year, which revenue would go toward education and transportation. “We expect to raise $1.9 billion statewide.”

Maria Rundle, Executive Director of The Flying Cloud Institute. Photo: David Scribner

There are currently eighteen individuals in the city of Pittsfield with incomes of over $1 million. (The population of Pittsfield, as of 2016, is 42,846, and per capita income in 2015 was $26, 293.)

One aspect of the good news in Pittsfield is the long list of who’s stepped up to fill in gaps for PPS’ most vulnerable kids, and the list includes Berkshire Museum. “One way we can do what we do,” explained Rush, “is through our community partners, like Jacob’s Pillow, Flying Cloud Institute, Kripalu, IS 183 Art School, and the Berkshire Museum.”

As an example, the museum this year is piloting a ‘substitute teacher’ program in all grades at Allendale Elementary School, bringing in their educators to work with students so that elementary teachers have time to collaborate for a class period. “They heard us crying out, and they provide us that time and breathing room, while our kids get great science instruction.”

Representative Farley-Bouvier said of the museum, “Berkshire Museum is front and center in the effort to support PPS. They have made promises for the future that we can count on, since they’ve proven themselves in the past.”

The Berkshire United Way is actually funding 11 programs that support extracurricular activities for Pittsfield’s public schools students, as Karen Vogel, told me, “covering areas of the arts, science and environment, college and career readiness, summer programming, and sexual health education.”

Manny Slaughter

One of those programs is the baby of two Pittsfield community leaders Vanessa and Manny Slaughter, who live just west of the museum. The Slaughters, on a mostly volunteer basis, have, for the past five summers, organized a free sports and literacy day camp, called the Marilyn Hamilton Literacy-Sports Program, for about 60 west side children on any given day. During the school year, they rent busses and get the kids out of town, to shows, MCLA, the Basketball Hall of Fame.

So when folks want to take the temperature of the West Side community, they talk to the Slaughters. When I asked Vanessa, after a recent meeting, “What do you think about the issue with the museum selling off their paintings?” she looked uncharacteristically at a loss. She was not familiar with the issue.

This is not to say that opinions in general are hard to find on the West Side. The following is a partial list of the issues on citizens’ minds, collected at a public forum organized by City Hall at Conte Community School in February of 2016.

  • Need for housing rehabilitation
  • Question if there is funding for removal of black mold and asbestos.
  • Funding for homelessness; funds to convert housing into shelters.
  • Additional lighting in Tyler Street area due to recent crime and shootings.
  • Funds to provide to contractors to rehab vacant buildings.
  • City playground/parks are not up to code to bring children.

More by »

8 Comments   Add Comment

  1. John says:

    When Pittsfield was home to industry, it was such a prosperous city. Sadly, taxes were raised over and over again, business was forced to move away.
    What filled the gap then was more government spending and endless government promises. A very similar situation to North Adams.
    It is truly criminal for citizens to pay high taxes to the government for years and years. Then industry is gone, the tax base reduces, and then the government squanders what is left and leaves the citizens to hang dry. Again, North Adams is an absolutely perfect example.
    So sad to see such a serious drug problem evolve. A lot of this starts in the liberal schools.
    1. Drug test all the teachers.
    2. Drug detecting dogs need to constantly be in the schools.
    3. Invest in practical edcation . We all need toilets to flush and lights to go on. While “arts” feel good and can be appreciated, the arts is not the basis of every economy.
    4. Cut the easy welfare benefits. Why work when you can get it all free…
    5. Free birth control. Teens don’t need to be parents, and taxpayers don’t need to pay for teen babies kids.
    6. Zero property taxes for 10 years for new businesses willing to establish. The government gets enough off of payroll and corporate taxes. The rest is greed.

    Pittsfield can thrive again, or it can continue its continued slide into the abyss. It’s all in how you vote folks.

  2. John Townes says:

    The author is absolutely correct in highlighting the socio-economic problems mentioned in the story. It is critical. However,the column is a cheap shot. It is misleading to use that as an excuse to disparage those who are opposed to the Berkshire Museum’s fire sale of its art and its effort to steamroll through a nebulous “New Vision.” It is possible to walk and chew gum at the same time — and it is possible for people to care about more than one thing at the same time…..And the issues are connected. The biggest problem with the museum is that they hatched a grandiose plan to sell off its most valuable assets (masterpieces of art) and change the museum’s mission with no real community input…..One effect of this will be to deprive the kids mentioned in the article of the ability to see great art in their backtard — which is a soul enriching experience. …The controversy regarding the museum did not have to be an either/or divisive controversy. It could have (should have) been a positive process that galvanized the community in support of the museum and its role in education…..But the way this has been done is flat-out wrong….Why is the museum pushing this through so quickly? Why has the museum chosen to alienate many in the community and turn itself into a pariah nationally to remnake itself into a glorified video game arcade?….The opponents of the art care just as much about the challenges facing the kids in Pittsfield as anyone. ….Setying it up as a false choice hurts efforts to work together as a community to find shared solutions for all of the city’s challenges.

    1. John Townes says:

      correction to a typo in the reply above: “The opponents of the art SALE care just as much…etc.”

  3. Mickey Friedman says:

    As a writer I am always interested in how people respond. I, for one, am so grateful to have learned about the ever-worsening plight of our schoolchildren in Pittsfield. Rarely have I learned so much from such a short article. In no way has the author suggested that the arts don’t matter, merely to point out the fact that the children surrounding the Museum are in trouble and that perhaps a lot more energy needs to be put to that crisis. I want to thank from my twenty-something miles away all those spending their time and energy to help these children. We all owe them great thanks. I am opposed to the Museum selling their art because I believe that art ought to be seen and appreciated by the many not the few, and I suspect, that those who donated did so because they too believed that. But if I had to choose between chewing gum and walking, I’d dispense with the gum. And if we had to choose between saving the children or a painting or two, I’d go with the kids. But there is a simpler solution – a far more equitable tax system that forces the very wealthy and the corporations to pay more. To stop spending so much of our treasure on war and the war-making machinery and spend it on housing, job creation and our children. In the meantime many thanks to Sheela Clary for teaching me so much.

    1. John Townes says:

      It ws an excellent article, beyiond the shots at those who care about saving the art at the museum. That’s one of the reasons the digs annoyed me….My point was that poverty and the problem of schools should not be used to trivialize and dismiss other issues…..Caring about one thing does NOT requre an eithrer/or choice…… .Should any form of caring or action that doesn’t address the Worst Problem, in the World be ignored?……..I can list you an endless list of awful, outageous situations in Berkshire County, nationally and globally that should require our attention…If you want to get comparative, should we only care about the kids who are worst off in trhe world, such as child slaves in India or refugees in war-torn countries or hurricane victims?….Does that mean we should therefore ignore the problems of local schoollchildren becauase they’re not as badly off as them?…Should everyone who cares about something that is not our own personal hot buton be insulted? Obviiously not.

  4. mary says:

    How about this novel idea? If you can’t pay for them, don’t have them! Birth control is available folks!

  5. Grier Horner says:

    Both the writer, Sheela Clary, and Mickey Friedman in his comments, seem to be saying that because many poor children live within a mile of the Berkshire Museum it is OK to sell the art. I don’t get it. They say money should be spent to help the poor kids – and they are right. But what has that got to do with whether or not the art is sold. The museum wants to sell the art to raise $60 million to launch a new vision for the museum – a vision that includes $20 million in architectural improvements to the interior. The $60 million is not earmarked to help the impoverished kids. T
    he kids would be hurt if the museum were to close. But you don’t have to sell this art – which enriches the lives of kids no matter what their family income – to keep the museum open. A state agency and a Williams economic professor have both said that the museum could survive by initiating a fund drive. And the state agency, the Massachusetts Cultural Council, has asserted that the museum by selling the art is not living up to its public trust.

  6. peter greer says:

    Thank you Sheila for a well written article which has stimulated some good discussion My takeaway is that while the decisions of the berkshire museum are clearly worthy of ardent and loud dissent, the issues facing those living in poverty and struggling with understaffed schools /poor health care / playgrounds not up to code /etc etc etc should also be part of a much louder and broader coalition. It’s not about triaging social issues or justice , it s about how individual personal priorities diverge within a “community.” and which voices are heard via the press/social media etc . In the case of the museum , the issues the Slaughters and their neighbors care about are far removed from the beautiful facade of the museum and the treasures within. The responses on this thread show the embedded bias of what we tend to care about , in part due to the “community ” that goes on line to read the edge. Those most affected by the “ravages of poverty” are not (currently) part of this thread and its their voices , of mothers and fathers and kids that i would like to hear.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.