Sunday, February 16, 2025

News and Ideas Worth Sharing

HomeViewpointsLettersLet’s have complete...

Let’s have complete financial information at town meeting

In his letter to the editor, John Hart of Stockbridge writes: “We don't often know that the total cost of what we are voting for is not being put before us.” 

To the Editor:

Recent history of town meetings in Stockbridge has proven…. honestly, deceptive.

What does that mean? The attendees at town meetings, with a few exceptions, get caught up in the moment. Vote yes on this article — it’s written and explained that way so….. the vote ends up yes.

What we don’t often know is that the total cost of what we are voting for is not being put before us.

Oh, there is, supposedly, a bidding process and it just gets voted yes. The additional $100,000 here and there that gets added to the project isn’t addressed at Town meeting. The additional funds get approved in later selectman’s meetings (sometimes early Wednesday mornings) Why? Because… the project as approved ran into a snag?

Example, we (or most) were “sold” by a Selectman at the time, J. Christopher Irsfeld, on moving Town Hall from Procter Hall to Plain School. An enormously expensive project that I and others objected to because of the invisible taxpayer cost. That, along with no concrete reuse plan for Procter Hall, was an absurd vote. He was good at theatrics and salesmanship and it all was bought and is still being paid for by the Stockbridge taxpayers. The majority were bamboozled and voted for it, so it goes, eh? It continues to bleed our town coffers. Good sales job, bad results. The 2nd beginning to our current financial worries. The Plain and middle school construction came first.

Now, we have the new Monument Mountain maintenance/rebuild and “Shared Expenses” issues with other towns before us shortly.

Shared expenses? Like Police? No! Like Town Administrator? No! Do our selectmen ask the head’s of these departments their opinion or just make blind decisions on their own?

Share winter salt and sand expenses? Yes! Equipment? Yes!

We can be deceptively presented “short viewed” decisions like the Procter Hall to Plain School project — very expensive decisions, or we can ask our Finance Committee and Selectman to answer very dicey questions? Questions like: Before you come to us with the “sum of money” articles, can we get a solid bid on the project’s cost to put it before the taxpayers and voters? If it is quoted to be beyond our wishes, can we revisit the issue in a Special Town Meeting? Can’t do that? Don’t put it before us until “the sum of money” question can be definitively answered.

John H. Hart

Rattlesnake Mountain Rd

Stockbridge, Mass.

The writer is occasionally referred to as leader of “The Rattlesnake Gang.”

spot_img

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.

Continue reading

Leigh Davis is off to a running start

I am certain that, even as a freshman legislator, Leigh Davis will provide the ideas and leadership we all sorely need at the moment.

Those closest to Trump warned us not to let him back in the White House

Trump is transactional. Most decisions are based on what is in it for him.

With the Trump administration’s stop-work order on USAID, the United States has moved backwards, with possibly decades of loss

The administration’s actions are cruel and counterproductive. We can only hope that it is not too late to regain much of what has already been lost.

The Edge Is Free To Read.

But Not To Produce.