Leigh Davis appointed to represent town at horseracing hearing in Boston
Great Barrington — When Great Barrington’s home-rule petition on horse racing gets a hearing later this month in Boston, the town will be represented by one of its own.
At Thursday’s selectboard meeting, the board voted unanimously to designate selectboard member Leigh Davis as its representative at a public hearing before the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure at the State House.
The hearing is tentatively scheduled for Jan. 27. Davis will convey the results of a special town meeting last month that overwhelmingly approved the petition. Click here to read a letter to the joint committee signed by all five selectmen endorsing the home-rule petition.
At a special town meeting at Monument Mountain Regional High School auditorium Dec. 11, almost 300 residents overwhelmingly passed a warrant item on a home-rule petition requesting Great Barrington’s representatives in the state legislature to introduce legislation requiring approval of a horse racing license at both an annual town meeting and by a majority ballot vote.
There is no proposal currently before the town but Sterling Suffolk Racecourse has reached a lease agreement with fairgrounds owners Bart and Janet Elsbach to bring thoroughbred racing back to Great Barrington for up to 40 days in the months of September and October with the goal of starting in 2020, though that timeline seems unlikely at this point. The company expects to spend between $15 million and $20 million on the project.
But in order to accomplish that feat, Suffolk needs a change in state law to permit it to hold races in Great Barrington while at the same time allowing it to maintain its simulcasting and remote betting operations back at its closed race track in East Boston. In addition, Suffolk would need at least two — and perhaps three — special permits from the town.
The need for a change in state law is of the reasons for the proposed legislation, which has been referred to the aforementioned Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure and is still pending on Beacon Hill even without the sponsorship of state Sen. Adam Hinds, D-Pittsfield, who withdrew his support last year.
Davis, who is in her first year as a member of the selectboard, immediately took an interest in the subject when she heard that the legislation had been proposed last year. A group of area residents subsequently formed Citizens Concerned About GB Horse Racing, which organized the home-rule petition. Meanwhile residents are organizing written and oral testimony to support the petition at the hearing in Boston on Jan. 27.
For more information, see the following news stories and commentaries on The Edge:
- Home rule petition on horse racing officially filed as legislation in Boston
- ANALYSIS: Animal cruelty, local control doomed Hinds’ sponsorship of horse racing bill
- OP-ED: Residents organizing written, oral testimony to support home rule on horseracing
- What’s next for Great Barrington’s home rule and horse racing?
- The battle is not over for self-determination about horse racing
- Horse racing raises ethical and environmental issues
- Horse racing is cruel to animals
- Horse racing would undermine Great Barrington’s character
- Economic development through horse racing is imaginary
- Praise for Rep. ‘Smitty’ Pignatelli’s response to Great Barrington vote on horse racing