To the Editor:
I have been thinking about the oft-cited contention that Great Barrington taxpayers shoulder an unfairly high percentage of the Berkshire Hills Regional School District’s budget, so I decided to do my own analysis (see charts below). As you will see from the two boxed columns, GB has only 49 percent of the combined assessed single family property value of the three towns, but because it provides almost 70 percent of the resident student population, it gets hit with almost 70 percent of the BHRSD assessment.
My conclusion is that we don’t have to read any political tea leaves to understand why the three towns voted the way they did on the Monument Mountain Regional High School renovation proposal  — the economic fairness issue was a real one, and the voters got it. Stockbridge, which would have had to pay less than 15 percent of the cost and has over 32 percent of the assessed single-family home value of the three towns, voted 66 percent in favor of the renovation. West Stockbridge, which would have had to pay 15 percent of the cost and has 18 percent of the assessed value, voted 60 percent in favor. GB, with 70 percent of the cost and 49 percent of the assessed value, voted 40 percent in favor. Including choice and tuition-in students, GB provides only 50 percent of the total students in the District.
What would fairness look like? Allocation by each town’s share of total assessed property value (first boxed column in chart) rather than student enrollment (second boxed column), and reimbursement for the true average (not marginal) cost of choice and tuition-in students, which is approximately three times greater than the current rate. If this were done, it would also help reduce the gap between GB’s $13.56 residential tax rate (FY 2014) and Stockbridge’s $8.76, since the school budget accounts for approximately half of the GB town budget.
I can already hear the screams from Stockbridge about how unfair that would be, but consider this: the boundaries of our school district are defined by the geography of our three participating towns, but unlike other services that are town-specific and therefore appropriately paid by each town’s own taxpayers, public education is District-wide. The allocation of the BHRSD budget to the towns based on their student headcount is no more consistent with public education than taxing only families who have children in school would be. In fact, many public school districts in other states (including the East Greenbush, N.Y., Central School District where I received my own K-12 education, and which includes several neighboring towns) send out their own tax bills to property owners, separate from the town tax bills. We may be precluded from doing that in Massachusetts, but changing the District allocation formula to the towns as I have proposed would accomplish the same result.
Chip Elitzer
39 Alford Road
Great Barrington
