• Local
  • Pittsfield, MA
  • more weather >
Jay Gaulard
Windy Hill Farms on Route 7 north of Monument Mountain Regional High School. The Community Preservation Committee has recommended CPA funds be designed to preserve this property.

Eight CPA projects worth $776,000 before GB voters at Town Meeting

More Info
By Sunday, May 8, 2016 News 9

Great Barrington — If the town’s voters agree, Windy Hill Farms apple orchard on Route 7 will forever be out of the reach of developers.

At Monday’s (May 9) Annual Town Meeting the Community Preservation Committee will ask voters to approve $776,000 for 8 Community Preservation Act projects which, if approved, will mark the second year these state matched funds have been doled out to projects in historical preservation, community housing, open space and recreation categories.

The town’s CPA money comes from a 3 percent surcharge on a portion of property taxes.

While this year more than half the funds will go to applicants for two affordable housing projects due to “immediacy” and “need,” the remaining funds will go towards several historic preservation projects, the creation of trails, restoration work to the Housatonic River Walk, and something a little different this year: an agricultural preservation restriction (APR) for 40 of Windy Hill Farm’s 73 acres. The remaining acreage is considered “unbuildable,” according to the committee.

The committee said it would recommend adding $170,000 to the state Department of Agricultural Resources’ (DAR) purchase of Judy and Dennis Marebs’ land to preserve, into perpetuity, the highly successful 30-year-old orchard that also features a popular pick-your-own apples and blueberries business, sells plants and provides landscaping services. The farm is one of the first things people see when driving into town from the north, and provides jobs and general beauty that is the hallmark of the Berkshire landscape. The idea is to keep Windy Hill a working farm forever.

Other APR farms in town include Taft Farms, Berle’s sheep farm, Project Native, and crops along Route 23 going west.

In Housatonic the Unitarian Universalist Meeting of South Berkshire that is on the National Register of Historic Places would also receive a CPA grant. Photo: Heather Bellow

In Housatonic the Unitarian Universalist Meeting of South Berkshire that is on the National Register of Historic Places would also receive a CPA grant. Photo: Heather Bellow

The Marebs could get a lot more money on the market, said committee chair Karen W. Smith. “Three to four times this if they were to sell it outright.” Smith also said the land would continue to be taxed at the agricultural rate. The Marebs’ originally asked the committee for $200,000.

The land is in a high-value area making it good pickings for future developers.

DAR had the land appraised at $946,000 for fair market value, and the DAR committed $558,000 to purchase the property’s development rights. The CPA funds will represent 18 percent of the total to go to the Marebs, money that will help bridge the gap between what the state was willing to pay and what the land is worth.

Berkshire Natural Resources Council (BNRC) stepped in to help the Marebs apply to the state when it learned they wanted the APR. BNRC’s Naraian Schroeder told the Edge the Marebs were making a sound decision. “If you want to plan your land for the future, you do it while you can,” he said.

BNRC is also going to raise $40,000 to contribute. The Marebs are also chipping in to help make this happen.

“The Berkshires values its agricultural resources and Great Barrington values its farms,” Schroeder said. “This farm is at the entrance to town, it’s scenic, and a highly productive agricultural endeavor.”

At a November 2015 meeting where the project was discussed at length, committee member Martha Fick said “30 years of orchard growth” was worth preserving. “You could get big bucks for houses there if you were a developer.”

“They can sell it for fair market value or they can sell it to us to preserve it,” said member Kathleen Jackson.

“It’s an amazing gift to the town,” said member Deborah Salem.

The conditions set by the committee were that the town must be a co-holder of the restriction; that the money will only be released when the APR sale closes with the state; and that the money be returned to the town if for any reason the sale does not close.

The 8 acres of 100 Bridge Street would provide badly needed affordable housing, according to the Community Preservation Committee. Photo: David Scribner

The 8 acres of 100 Bridge Street would provide badly needed affordable housing, according to the Community Preservation Committee. Photo: David Scribner

The committee focused the bulk of the $800,000 they had to spend on what they agreed were critical affordable housing projects — $220,000 for one at 316 State Road and another for the future 100 Bridge Street development at the former Log Homes site, which the developer says will happen no matter where the rest of the development stands. 100 Bridge still does not have an anchor business, which Community Corporation of Southern Berkshire Executive Director Tim Geller says is necessary to the retail and office aspect of the site.

But Geller has told The Edge and town officials that the entire development is still in the works, and the affordable housing portion is in line for its state funds which will go into the pot with the CPA money. The site is set to be capped to contain dioxins in the soil, after a bioremediation project was shut down by the state last year.

Then there are smaller projects: $24,250 for electrical work at the Wheeler Farmstead, the future site of the Great Barrington Historical Society and a town museum, and Historical Commission survey work for $15,000 that will update and digitize the town’s historic records.

Community Health Programs (CHP) got approved for $10,000 to build a one-mile hiking loop that will begin at their parking lot off Route 7. It will be open to the public and is intended as a tool to help patients.

One project, while recommended by the committee, hit a few public nerves. The Unitarian Universalist Meeting of South Berkshire, as a National Register of Historic Places structure, needs significant structural repairs, including basement waterproofing and masonry work, chimney repairs, and structural reinforcement of the roof. The committee said it would give $60,000 for this, while the UUMSB is throwing in $10,000 of its own funds.

After Housatonic resident Michelle Loubert complained about what she thought may be a misuse of public funds in what she said was a separation of church and state issue, the committee contacted the state CPA official and legal counsel. The state considers this an appropriate use as long as the project is considered a “public benefit,” according to the committee, and “historic preservation is considered a public benefit under CPA law.” In this case, the UUMSB is also used as a community gathering place, is a village landmark, and this work will help keep it from falling apart.

A number of conditions were set for the release of these, and all funds, for all projects.

Dennis and Judy Mareb could not be reached for this report.

For more detailed information about all the projects and CPA funds go to the committee’s report for Town Meeting.

For a copy of the Great Barrington Annual Town Warrant that lists all the items to come before the voters on Monday, May 9, click here.


More by »
»

9 Comments   Add Comment

  1. Patrick Fennell says:

    Time to say no to these expensive tax funded projects especially the huge boondoggle Log Home site three decades and still just a blight, Windy Hill can remain a farm as long as they want without the money and the church will open a can of worms in the future. People are struggling to make ends meet and this Ponzi Scheme has to go. The state does NOT match funds and if we do get out of the CPA we have to pay the state back, oh and most of the Free money comes from the State General Fund, the same fund that shortchanges your roads and school buses.

  2. Susan P. Bachelder says:

    Mr. Fennell conflates a number of quite separate issues to make the point he does not feel contributing to the community is of interest to him. GB will get $187,000 from the state this year to help pay for affordable housing, and assist a rural historic lifestyle enjoyed by not only residents, but visitors to the Berkshires who contribute to our economy. CPA is a useful funding tool for 21st century needs in our communities and I applaud the use of this money for housing, historic architecture, and agriculture in our midst.

    1. Patrick Fennell says:

      So you are willing to forgo bus transportation to regional schools, road and bridge repairs, and other needs for a few luxuries? Remember when the CPA first came about less than twenty towns belong to it, now there are over 150 cities and towns and not enough money from the Register of Deeds offices to support full funding, now a great deal comes from the general fund, which is supposed to fund schools, roads and public safety. As for the so-called state funding, try to pull out of the CPA and find out how FREE it is, the cities and towns have to return the so-called FREE money before they can leave it. Bernie Madoff couldn’t come up with a better scheme than the CPA.

      1. K.Johnson says:

        Patrick: There is much to agree with you, and my basic question is why tax payers are supporting private businesses? Windy Hill, Log Home project & State Road housing will be making money for their own special interests and the rest of us will be taxed.

    2. Michael Wise says:

      Preserving historical buildings and open spaces and adding affordable housing are high priorities in the town’s Master Plan. The CPA is principally a way for us to make ourselves put our own money into these goals, which improve the quality of life and even support economic development but which tend to be put off and put off. The state’s promise to match some of the towns’ contributions is a way to encourage towns to do it. In the latest round of budget amendments, the legislature decided to put $10 million of the state’s surplus fund into the CPA trust fund. The CPA trust fund has paid out about $500 million since it started, or about $35 million per year on average.

      1. Patrick Fennell says:

        How can the state have a surplus fund if not all the needs are met statewide, like roads, bridges, school costs, etc.? Basically the state is cheating the taxpayers out of needed services to give towns the impression they are getting FREE stuff, but to get out of the CPA the town must pay back the state and the money was supposed to come from fees from Register of Deeds offices and not come from the state budget.

  3. Michelle Loubert says:

    At my daughter’s college graduation which will begin shortly. Saw that I “complained” regarding the recommendation to 1089 Main Street. No, I am “opposed” to this use of public funds. Although the building is historic, it is an active house of worship. Separation of church and state is one argument but by no means the only argument against this recommendation. More to come at annual town meeting. Now, back to my daughter’s graduation. Go Emerson!

    1. Bill Dodds says:

      I am curious about the UU Church as well. not because of ‘separation of church and state’ but because they seem to be asking for normally required maintenance (waterproofing, masonry, roofing) for which building owners are generally responsible.
      There is no doubt that it is a beautiful building that adds to the community, but whether normal owner maintenance costs technically fall under the heading of ‘historical preservation’ I am uncertain.
      There are a lot of worthy projects, it is going to be an interesting evening with some tough choices to make.

  4. Leonard Quart says:

    It strikes me that the need for affordable housing is no luxury, and preserving historical buildings sustains the past. No one would argue against money for roads and schools, but why sacrifice other communal and aesthetic needs for basic services.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.