Education task force deserves credit – not blame — for tackling enrollment decline

More Info
By Saturday, Aug 12 Viewpoints  10 Comments

It is an immutable law of physics that expanding entities experience growing pains of one kind or another. But as Berkshire County residents are increasingly discovering, shrinking also entails a certain degree of discomfort.

Such is the case with key county statistics that show discouraging signs of decline in its full-time population, its birth rate and its loss of manufacturing jobs over the last 30 years. Those factors have contributed to troubling drops in school enrollment.

Berkshire County school districts saw an enrollment drop of a staggering 22 percent between 2000 and 2015. The UMass Donahue Institute, has projected an additional decline of 11 percent between 2015 and 2025, with substantial additional enrollment losses predicted over the following decade.

The decrease in enrollments will no doubt precipitate all manner of unpleasant consequences for the county’s school districts. Smaller student bodies will mean fewer academic offerings, fewer top-flight facilities and weakened athletic and extracurricular options. All of those factors will limit student options for engagement. Common sense tells us they will weaken student readiness for higher education and preparedness for the work force.

Perhaps worst of all, fewer students will surely erode the political will to invest in our schools, leaving the county’s children in a state of limbo when it comes to having access to first-rate teachers and facilities. After all, a pair of referendums on $50-million-plus renovation projects for Monument Mountain Regional High School failed within a span of 12 months. One of the reasons given by some of those who voted against the projects: why spend so much money on a new high school when there might not be the bodies to fill it a generation down the line?

All of this is occurring amid a backdrop of stagnant middle-class wages and flat or shrinking revenues, even as education costs continue their inexorable rise. Something has to be done. Attracting young people and families with children in far greater numbers to the Berkshires is complicated — perhaps even impossible. So we are left with making our schools more viable with fewer resources.

That’s where the Berkshire County Education Task Force comes in. The task force has no legal authority but it’s made up of educators, public officials and members of the business community who are passionate about saving the county’s education system.

Last month, the task force made what the chair of the Lee School Committee, herself a member of task force, called a “shocking” recommendation: the county’s 19 school districts should be merged into one countywide district.

The task force has said from the get-go that its primary consideration is improving the education of the county’s children. The task force does concede that in seeking more favorable economies of scale, it wants to make the system more fiscally sustainable in an era of limited resources. Those two goals are perfectly compatible since long-term sustainability will also improve educational opportunities for students.

One member of the Berkshire Hills Regional School Committee recently lashed out at the task force, calling it “a total wild goose chase” led by “some select group of random people.” Others on social media, however, have been less responsible than the school committee member, questioning the motives of task force members and suggesting they’re determined to push their agendas in defiance of the will of the people.

Such comments do a disservice to the members of the task force, which has no legal authority to make changes to the school districts and whose unpaid members have spent countless Saturday mornings over the last two years laboring over details and policy papers. The charge of the panel is to study the issues surrounding the sustainability of the county’s school districts and make a recommendation for action based on the collection of data and projections.

Among those data and projections are current and future student enrollment numbers in individual districts. Currently, the county’s 19 school districts serve about 15,000 students (soon to be 14,000), fewer than several individual city school districts in Massachusetts. Berkshire County has the same number of districts as the entire state of Delaware, which has large rural areas in its southern half and a student population of about 156,000.

The numbers here are startling. In the Southern Berkshire Regional School District alone, there were almost 1,100 students among the district’s five towns as recently as 2000. Now there are about 650. By 2025, the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education projects there will be no more than 462 students in grades pre-k to 12 — a loss of almost 60 percent since 2000.

The questions about sustainability are obvious. According to the projections, there will be 127 students enrolled in grades 9 to 12 in Mount Everett Regional High School in Sheffield in 2025. How do officials operate a comprehensive public high school with such a low enrollment? Curricular offerings would be confined to the basics. With a senior class of only about 32 students, advanced placement and elective classes would become a thing of the past; either that or those classes would be composed of two or three students guided by a very expensive teacher. Furthermore, athletic and after-school offerings would by necessity become sparse.

Mount Everett is the smallest comprehensive 9-12 school in the county but even Lee and Lenox are projected to have only about 200 students in their high schools by 2025. Might those tiny high schools struggle to maintain their accreditations from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, which insists that accredited public high schools offer “challenging and measurable 21st century learning expectations for all students”? That’s not an attractive situation if you’re aiming to attract families with children to the region.

The task force has characterized its recommendation for a single countywide district as “aspirational.” That’s probably a nod to the reality that it will be a tough sell and that perhaps the other options for reorganization — a single school union for the county or three separate consolidated districts — will offer the promise of maintaining more local control, while allowing for sharing of services, improved economies of scale and the staving off of academic ruin.

Whatever happens, two things are indisputable: something must be done to make public education in the Berkshires sustainable; and, like the embattled referees in a youth soccer game, the members of the Berkshire County Education Task Force are to be commended for stepping up to volunteer their time and for subjecting themselves to heckling from those on the sidelines.

Return Home

10 Comments   Add Comment

  1. John says:

    Wow. This one surely missed reality…..

    Property taxes have exploded over recent years . The author refuses to acknowledge this, and acknowledge that people vote with their feet and move to an area which is far more cost effective. The excessive taxes have driven away companies as well and those folks left.
    Government employees continue to be shielded from the true cost of healthcare and true cost of lucrative pensions. The taxpayer continues to bear the burden of these ever expanding costs.
    Dumping > 50 million into monument at this point is senseless. Close it down if it’s that bad.
    The demand for public schools is decreasing. The number of schools must decrease, and consequent number of employees. Basic laws of supply and demand.
    Perhaps our forefathers had the right idea years ago, with the 1 room schoolhouse…

    1. Steve Farina says:

      Today, a one room schoolhouse could be fitted with technology to allow educational experiences from around the world, multiplying advanced placement and elective options – without the need for the loss of local control, increased transportation costs, and added problem of having to gain approval from 30 towns and 2 cities for every financial, and any other required, decision.
      The suggestion of the “Task Force”, and this anonymous editorial, are inanely myopic.

  2. Susan P. Bachelder says:

    Aspirational or pie in the sky? As I have stated before, every house will be a one room school house when we have reliable high speed internet. NOWHERE has the impact of internet been factored into the equation for new methods of education in the Berkshires. Soon, the home computer commuters will be bringing families here, and the special AP students will register at Harvard for advanced physics in their local library or Town Hall once a week. Classrooms will be where we put them. One room school houses will do nicely. These are the factors that will attract families. There is nothing local about a school that a child has to commute an hour each way to get to. The time of the one room school house, plugged into the 21st century is the future. Create circuit riding teachers, instead of busloads of kids. Certainly the analytics are there to create this model. While civility might be a scarce commodity these days, if the emperor doesn’t have any clothes on, then he doesn’t have any clothes on and this report, no matter the amount of time and energy expended, fails in its mission.

    1. Steve Farina says:

      I agree Susan…I was typing the same point while you were posting it 🙂

    2. Pete says:

      Where is this working? Who oversees all of the one room school rooms, who accredits them, how are the courses from Harvard funded. How will they meet state and college accreditation requirements? Who pays for all of the software and hardware that will be required? Great concept, but the details are not as simple as plugging in your lap top. Join the committee, you have some good ideas. My experience with on line learning is that it has limitations, better for training vs. learning. Your ideas are what we may end up with, how can we make it work? What have other parts of the country done in similar cases? I have a lot of questions, no answers.

      1. Steve Farina says:

        I agree, there are many unanswered questions with this. The possibilities definitely exist, however. And, shouldn’t that have been some of the creative process the “Task Force” investigated? I missed the one meeting I heard about in GB, and was never sent, nor ever saw, the survey that was promised for those who missed it. Unfortunately, the task force has already handed down their recommendations and, sadly, it does not seem they would be willing to change course at this point…

  3. Steve Farina says:

    As for “hecklers on the sidelines” – those would be the TAXPAYERS who pay for this mess!! And don’t you forget that!

    1. John says:

      Well said.

      It is the students and taxpayers that matter, NOT the teachers unions.

  4. Bobby Houston says:

    From what I hear, the consultant who has been shepherding the task force was absent the day of the ‘shocking’ vote – and would have had a considerable influence in heading off that decision.

  5. Leonard Quart says:

    A cogent, strong editorial that clearly provokes response. Being an outsider, I wouldn’t presume to have the answer to a problem that will only get worse. Diminishing enrollments demand new ways of seeing.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.

Smoke Signals from the Swamp: The Son-in-Law

Friday, Feb 16 - With all the talk about the varied skills of Corey Lewandoski, Paul Manafort and Steve Bannon, who took turns steering the Trump campaign, many were surprised by the title of the Nov. 22, 2016, Forbes article: “How Jared Kushner Won Trump the White House.”

don’t talk. just kiss

Saturday, Feb 10 - Her lips were her one point of vanity that she had carried like a phantom tiara in the thick of her arm.