• Local
  • Pittsfield, MA
  • more weather >
David Scribner
The Great Barrington Annual Town Meeting assembled in the auditorium of Monument Mountain Regional High School.

By overwhelming margin, Great Barrington adopts ‘trust policy’ for immigrants

More Info
By Tuesday, May 2, 2017 News 10

Great Barrington — It’s finally a done deal. After a sustained campaign of several months, Great Barrington residents have joined several other municipalities in the state in declaring their town a so-called sanctuary town for immigrants.

On the warrant for Monday’s annual town meeting was a so-called “trust policy” designating the town “a safe and inclusive community” that will not enforce federal immigration law or “aid in the detention, transfer, transport or deportation of residents for civil immigration purposes.”

The mere announcement by moderator Michael Wise of the motion that the policy be adopted caused loud and spontaneous applause from the 406 voters who packed the Monument Mountain Regional High School auditorium to consider the 28 articles on the warrant.

Multicultural BRIDGE Executive Director Gwen VanSant reading her statement in support of the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

Multicultural BRIDGE Executive Director Gwen VanSant reading her statement in support of the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

“As a town, if we want a beloved community, we must stand for justice … without attaching difference to privilege,” said Gwendolyn Hampton VanSant of Multicultural Bridge, which had worked with the town to craft an acceptable resolution. (To read the complete text of her statement, see below.)

Van Sant thanked the Selectboard in joining other communities across the state that have adopted the policy. The policy, she said “signifies that we value all” and “it also preserves our local physical resources” and “communicates our diversity.”

Housatonic resident Anne O'Dwyer reading a statement in support of the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

Housatonic resident Anne O’Dwyer reading a statement in support of the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

“A community in which any of our members live in fear … is not a community we would want Great Barrington to be,” added Housatonic resident Anne O’Dwyer.

“Living in fear is the not the quality of a welcoming and safe community — it is instead the very essence of a totalitarian state,” O’Dwyer continued. “A community in which any of our members live in fear is not the kind of community that any of us, regardless of political affiliation, I am sure, want Great Barrington to be.” (To read the complete text of her statement, see below).

Lara Setti, a physician at Community Health Programs in Great Barrington and a board member of Multicultural Bridge, spoke of the policy in terms of public health and clarified for the skeptical that the trust policy only pertains to civil immigration policy, which is the exclusive province of the federal government, and not criminal complaints. She added that the trust policy applies not only to immigration status, but also to other residents based on age, disability, ethnicity and the like.

“I see the detriment daily of people living in fear and not accessing medical care,” Setti said. “This article is absolutely essential for the public health of this community.”

School Street resident and trust policy supporter Gabrielle Senza looked at it from a law enforcement point of view, adding that, “When people don’t feel safe in their homes, they need to feel they can call the police.”

Barbara Zheutlin, who heads Berkshire Grown, which supports and promotes local agriculture, alluded to the important role undocumented immigrants play in the local economy.

Steve Farina, expressing opposition to the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

Steve Farina, expressing opposition to the Trust Policy. Photo: David Scribner

“Berkshire Grown can speak up, while many farms, restaurants and retailers cannot,” Zheutlin said. “So on behalf of our many restaurants, retail and farm members, Berkshire Grown speaks in favor of the trust policy because we’re committed to creating a safer place for all our residents and community members.”

There were a few skeptics of the trust policy in the audience, however. Among them was Steve Farina, who argued that “There’s absolutely no need to put this kind of policy in place … it goes against the rights of people who are here legally.”

Another skeptic, Christopher Tufts, wondered whether the new policy could cause the town to lose some sources of federal funding, as the administration of President Donald Trump has threatened to do.

“Attorney General Jeff Sessions talked about sanctuary cities losing funding,” Tufts said. “Is it wise for us as a community … to go down this path of becoming a sanctuary city and possibly losing federal funding?”

Community organizer and Multicultural BRIDGE staff member Jeffrey Lowenstein said the town could conceivably lose the ability to apply for federal police grants, but in the last fiscal year, they only amounted to $1,952, which he termed a “fairly puny amount of money.”

The town’s new policy, which grew out of a statement drafted by the Selectboard and the police department last fall and adopted by the board, says the department will treat undocumented citizens like everyone else and will not be an arm of ICE (the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency).

Police Chief William Walsh explaining his department's policies. Photo: David Scribner

Police Chief William Walsh explaining his department’s policies. Photo: David Scribner

The town of Great Barrington now joins Berkshire County’s two cities, North Adams and Pittsfield, in adopting such policies. Hundreds of other cities, counties and several states have adopted similar policies. Earlier this year, both the Southern Berkshire  and Berkshire Hills  regional school districts adopted like-minded policies as they pertain to their own campuses.

Tufts asked to hear the point of view of law enforcement officials of trust policy. Longtime Police Chief William Walsh told the crowd his department does not get involved in enforcing federal immigration law. He said he had met with a group of supporters of the policy and “overall we’re okay with this policy.”

“If there’s a really bad guy in town, we have the tools to address that,” Walsh explained. “ICE can do what they want to do … If it’s a really bad actor, they will make the decision to come up and remove that person.”

In the end, the motion to approve the policy passed by a show of hands so overwhelming that it did not require a count. The approval was followed by a round of shouting and applause that was near deafening

 *     *     *

Statement by Gwendolyn VanSant of Multicultural BRIDGE

First, I want to thank the Selectboard for the initiative in joining communities across the Commonwealth in the Sanctuary Resolution. This signifies that you value all of our new residents and invite the rest of our Great Barrington community to join you.

As a town, we continue to lead our county by being the first accredited police department of the Berkshires, and your commitment to building relationships through community policing is something we can all be proud of.

This proposed Trust Policy preserves a clear path to keep our communities safe by enacting a specific protocol. We all share the principles of wanting to ensure trust and safety for all residents and their families in Great Barrington that consider our town their home, place of work, recreation and worship.

Our Trust Policy ensures civil liberties, builds transparency and ensures justice. We are focused on promoting inclusivity – safety from retaliation, harm or threats of danger. The Trust Policy also preserves our local fiscal resources to protect our local civil and human rights and communicates our commitment to embracing diversity and social justice. Concrete steps in the Trust Policy are outlined that we can take together in collaboration among residents, town staff and police. In the words of Bell Hooks: “If we want a beloved community, we must stand for justice, have recognition for difference without attaching difference to privilege.”

Our positive vote is for taking a stand together for trust and safety for our diverse Great Barrington population.

On behalf of Multicultural BRIDGE, thank you.

*     *     *

Remarks by Anne O’Dwyer

I am grateful to the Selectboard, Multicultural BRIDGE, and the Police Department, who worked together to articulate this resolution for a Safe and Inclusive Community.

The great strength of this resolution is, of course, that it is the product of a collaborative effort of these organizations within our town. But it is also of great importance in that it enables our town and those in the town charged with protecting us – to do just that: protect and serve us in the way we have charged them to do: to protect all members of our community.

Great Barrington has long been a place where immigrants have come to find a new and better life. Yet, as we all know, recent federal executive orders have been issued that are intended to intimidate, threaten and target immigrants – and they have created a great deal of fear nationwide, as well as in our Great Barrington community.

Many of us find ourselves afraid– some for our own safety, but also often for the safety of our families, our parents, our children, our friends, our neighbors, our co-workers, and our students.

Living in fear is the not the quality of a welcoming and safe community—it is instead the very essence of a totalitarian state. A community in which any of our members live in fear is not the kind of community that any of us, regardless of political affiliation, I am sure, want Great Barrington to be.

Thus, I am so proud that with this Article, Great Barrington would be joining with the many towns and cities in Massachusetts that have already adopted such policies, as well as the 5 states, more than 100 cities and 600 counties nationwide that also have such policies in place.

It is time that we all take a stand for all of the underrepresented groups in our community, and those who are the most vulnerable. What affects one of us, affects us all.

This a moment for us to be quite clear in our commitment to being a trusting, welcoming and safe community… and vote to support this Article– to designate Great Barrington a Safe and Inclusive Community with Trust Policy Principles and Protocols in place.

More by »

10 Comments   Add Comment

  1. Steve Farina says:

    More telling about how the town feels about equality was the vote on Article 16. The voters were presented with the opportunity to put a halt to the CDC Bridge St Affordable Housing project, and the opportunity to force the developers to come back with a plan to incorporate the Affordable Housing more appropriately into the community, rather than allowing them to continue to build the Affordable Housing up against the Sewage Treatment Plant.
    More than half of the voters present voted to allow Article 16 and thus allow the development to continue as currently presented.
    What was it Bell Hooks was quoted as saying? Well go back and read it again…
    So much for valuing “All”

  2. Steve Farina says:

    And, btw, a sincere Thank You to ALL who obviously put in so much effort to make this a very successful Town Meeting!

    1. Tim Geller says:

      I invite Steve and anyone else to stand with me at the corner of Bentley and Crosby and explain how this affordable housing site will negatively impact the quality of life of the 45 families who will live there. Any such argument is brazenly not fact-based (a national epidemic, it seems). With upgrades to the treatment plant over the last ten years, odor is simply not an issue, having been on this site myself hundreds of times. The remediation of the site will result in the affordable parcel being completely, 100% free of any contamination – cleaned up to “residential standards, no restrictions”. The views toward East Mountain and west to the river are spectacular, and any view of the treatment plant on the south will be blocked with a bank evergreens. Residents will be able to walk to work, downtown businesses, shopping and entertainment. There are two town parks within a two minute walk. This is the actual reality on the ground – any characterization of this location as an economic class equality issue is simply a red herring. We invite the naysayers to thoughtfully consider this reality for what it is – a beautiful town asset that will dramatically improve the quality of life of hundreds of families for many generations to come – and to redirect the negative energy towards actively helping us solve our chronic shortage of housing that’s affordable for all.

      1. Steve Farina says:

        And if we meet and I convince you that changing location would positively impact the quality of life of the future residents, would you be willing to change your plans and build it differently?

      2. Patrick Fennell says:

        100 Bridge Street is a disaster and a very expensive one at that. The housing should be placed in the middle of the site since any no one else wants to be on the site. Where the Co-op was supposed to go would be a good place for decent housing. Placing housing next to a sewage treatment plant is simply wrong. Move the housing to a decent location. What is considered Affordable Housing anyway$$$$$?

      3. Steve Farina says:

        Not sure how long I should wait for an answer…perhaps your offer was the “red hereing”.
        You have attacked my “arguments” as not being “fact based” and we haven’t ever talked.
        But since you seem to have this marketing approach down (and you brought it up) perhaps you could use this slogan in your fliers:
        “Come move here to the bottom of the hill, where you don’t have to worry about air quality. Do to recent technology we have been able to prove that the effluent of the affluent (which is everyone other than you, dear potential resident) is odorless.”
        And you could continue, “We the more affluent than you have known for a long time that ‘Our sh-t don’t stink’, and no we can say it with certainty. This is why we chose to put your home next our sewage, rather than a retail or office space which would not have the constant reminder of knowing where they belong”.
        “But not to worry about the visuals, we will plant an evergreen hedge that will be three stories high so you won’t have to watch us stir it up.”

        Tim, I am willing to discuss this if you are willing to change the plans. Otherwise, we go with how more than half the voters voted and let you do your thing.
        My positive energy right now is focused on looking for properties in town with which Affordable Housing can be had with dignity.

      4. Patrick Fennell says:

        I have discussed this project with Smitty Pignatelli and he agrees that the housing should be moved and anchor businesses that don’t exist cancelled out.

  3. DB says:

    Two in every crowd

    1. Steve Farina says:

      Really DB (whatever that means)? You would move there?

  4. Steve Farina says:

    I’ll take the silence as a “no” to both of my questions…

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.