Airport owners again seek permission for controversial new hangarsMore Info
Great Barrington — The owners of the Great Barrington airport continue to encounter headwinds in their quest to build three new hangars at the facility west of town on Route 71. It seems every time they appear before a town board or commission, new objections are raised by neighbors and others. Hearings have been continued as town officials review new material and discover murky legalities.
Such was the case Monday evening (March 27) as representatives from Berkshire Aviation went before the Select Board for the second time in an effort to secure a special permit to build the hangars and to justify the 86-year-old airport’s legal existence under a zoning code that was first enacted only two years after it was built.
In the standing-room-only selectmen’s room, Berkshire Aviation attorney Lori A. Robbins came forward with new information from town assessor Chris Lamarre and Fire Chief Charlie Burger. And there was a letter from the Southern Berkshire Chamber of Commerce extolling the airport’s virtues.
In response to complaints from neighbors that the new hangars would lower their property values, Robbins cited a letter from Lamarre that stated, “There is no discernable evidence leading me to conclude future real property values will be negatively impacted by such an occasion and to assert otherwise is speculation.”
Indeed, Lamarre added, many homes on Seekonk Cross Road and Egremont Plain Road, where the airport is located, have sold for a price in excess of their assessed value within the last three years.
Burger addressed the concerns some airport critics had about the storage and use of combustible and flammable substances on the property, adding that he “has no objection to the construction” and that “[the substances] are in small quantities and in compliance with state regulations regarding these materials.”
But Rich Dohoney, an attorney for airport neighbors Marc Fasteau and Anne Fredericks of 77 Seekonk Cross Road, had other ideas. He presented a list of proposed conditions that his clients would like to see attached to any special permit issued. (The text of these conditions is reproduced below.)
Among those conditions is that the runways not be lengthened (the owners have said this is impossible anyway, given the constraints of the property). Dohoney also listed limits on retail activities, including at the flight school and the aircraft repair business, limits on the number of aircraft housed at the airport (50), and restrictions on military helicopter activity (airport officials have said they have no control over this).
Dohoney also insisted there be no sales of leaded fuel on the property. As reported by The Edge last month, the Walter J. Koladza Airport, as the Great Barrington facility is known, sells leaded aviation fuel — or so-called “avgas” — at its self-serve pump.
Dohoney also offered an alternate interpretation of what the special permit, if approved, would allow the airport to do. He suggested one or two more special permits would be needed: one to codify the airport’s legal status; another for the proposed hangars; and yet another for the structures to be built in the town’s water quality protection zone.
“A yes or no vote on this does not authorize those hangars,” Dohoney said. “Nonconforming uses are a necessary evil but they are not to be encouraged or to grow.”
The airport was built before the town established its first zoning code in 1931. It is therefore a pre-existing nonconforming use and the site lies in an aquifer protection zone next to the Green River. Any expansion requires a special permit from the selectmen.
However, the zoning bylaws also require that an aviation field in a R-4 residential zone obtain a special permit, which the airport never was compelled to apply for because of its grandfathered status.
But the airport took the unusual step of voluntarily applying after the fact for the special permit, which includes the proposal to add the new hangars, “In order to quell any concerns about the legal status of use of the property as an airport,” Robbins said last month.
“In my opinion, if the [special permit] application were to be approved as proposed, it would include allowing the three hangars in the manner and the location proposed,” Town Planner Chris Rembold told this reporter. “They would also be subject to Planning Board site plan approval.”
As for property values, both Fasteau and Dohoney said they disagreed with the assessor, with Dohoney adding, “People bought their homes thinking it was a hobby airport.” This elicited laughter in the audience.
“What’s happened in the past is not a good measure of what would happen with three new hangars,” Fasteau insisted. “I respect our assessor but I disagree.”
Airport owner Rick Solan and manager Ken Krentza said the airport’s underground fuel tanks are scheduled to be replaced in August, as required every 20 years.
“To solve the problem, we are putting them in above-ground at a higher cost to preserve the land and not risk having fuel go into river,” Krentza said.
At one point, Solan got into a shouting match with Claudia Shapiro, an abutter who has sued Berkshire Aviation and the town multiple times and claims she actually owns part of the airport’s property. When Select Board Chairman Sean Stanton called for order and asked her to show some restraint, Shapiro mockingly urged him to call the police.
Michael Mah, a Pittsfield-based software engineer who keeps his plane in Pittsfield because Great Barrington doesn’t have indoor storage, warned of the alternative if Koladza were to close.
“I have two words as an alternative to the airport and that is Desisto School,” Mah said, referring to a massive hotel and residential resort planned for the former private school campus in Stockbridge.
“If [the airport] does not survive, we could be looking not at three hangars but hundreds of homes on 90 acres. It’s a large concern if the airport does not survive.”
In the end, the board asked Rembold to come up with a list of conditions to attach to the special permit application when the hearing continues on May 15 at 6:30 p.m. at Town Hall.
Text of the proposed conditions for a special permit, as presented to the Selectboard:
To: Town of Great Barrington
From: Donovan, O’Connor & Dodig LLP
Re: Application for Special Permit
Berkshire Aviation Enterprises
Please accept the following as proposed conditions to be imposed on the Special Permit requested by Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc. (“BAE”) for the property located at 70 Egremont Plain Road (the “Premises”).
- Any activity requiring a special permit under the Massachusetts Building Code shall be a material change to the Special Permit requiring approval pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws ch. 40A, Section 9 and Section 10.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.
- There shall be no increase in the length of the existing runway(s).
- The existing runways shall be reduced and/or reconfigured to provide a five hundred (500) foot runway safety area.
- There shall be no restaurants or food service conducted at he Premises.
- There shall no retail sales of any kind, including aircraft sales, at the Premises.
- There shall be no rental car business conducted at the Premises.
- The aircraft repair business shall be limited to one (1) mechanic.
- The flight school business shall be limited to four (4) instructors.
- There shall be no more than fifty (50) aircraft housed at the Premises.
- There shall be no helicopter operation at the Premises except: a) Helicopters used for emergency medical transport and b) United States military helicopters which shall be limited to six (6) days per year.
- Within six (6) months of issuance of the Special Permit and prior to the issuance of any building permits, BAE shall submit a Phase II Environmental Assessment conducted by a licensed site professional pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws ch. 21E to the Zoning Enforcement Officer.
- All existing subsurface surface sewage disposal systems at the Premises shall be fully compliant with Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000) and BAE shall file a Title 5 Official Inspection Form with “Passes” checked in Section “B. Certifications” to the Zoning Enforcement Officer by July 1, 2017.
- There shall be no sale of leaded fuel at the Premises.
- There shall be no underground storage takes [sic] at the Premises. All existing underground storage tanks shall be lawfully removed by September 1, 2017.
- All existing structures shall comply with the dimensional requirement of Section 9.2 of the Zoning Ordinance by January 1, 2018.