Tax Day rally and protest to be held in Park Square

More Info
By Wednesday, Apr 12 We the People  3 Comments

Pittsfield — The Berkshire Democratic Brigades will be holding a Tax Day standout In concert with almost 200 other tax day marches and protests around the country on Saturday, April 15, from 1 to 2 p.m. Park Square. Along with hundreds of thousands of people all over the United States and elsewhere in the world, local protestors will be demanding that Donald Trump release his tax returns once and for all. The national tax march initiative is supported by the American Federation of Teachers, Americans for Tax Fairness, the Center for Popular Democracy, Indivisible, MoveOn.Org, Our Revolution, the Working Families Party and other organizations.

Presidents and presidential candidates have shown the American people their returns for decades. President Trump promised to do so many times during his campaign. Despite the fact that millions petitioned Trump to release his tax records within days of his inauguration, he claimed “people don’t care.” A January ABC/Washington Post poll indicated that 74 percent of Americans wanted to see the president’s returns.

At least 19 states have introduced legislation to require presidential candidates to release tax returns, including Massachusetts’ Bill S.365, An Act Restoring Financial Transparency in Presidential Elections.

The Berkshire Democratic Brigades will also be standing out to urge the legislature and the voters of the Commonwealth to enact the Fair Share Amendment in Massachusetts, nicknamed the “millionaire’s tax.” The bill would add a surcharge of 4 percent on yearly incomes over $1 million to enhance the state’s transportation and education budgets. It is proposing a modest return on the wealth the state has helped produce for its millionaires, so that public services, which benefit everyone, get more of the revenue they need.

Return Home

3 Comments   Add Comment

  1. Steve Farina says:

    Really? What a waste of time. He doesn’t need to show his returns, and I for one hope he does not. If the states really want to require something it should be having to provide a valid birth certificate to show that a candidate (President and Congressmen) meets the Constitutional requirements of place of birth and age.
    Nowhere does the Constitution require having to provide income justification to become an elected representative of the people.

  2. John says:

    I am taken back with people’s extreme interest in President Trumps personal tax returns. Frankly this is a waste of time. I’m sure he paid more in Jet fuel tax alone than most of the people so concerned pay in a decade…

    There are far more important concerns than reviewing President Trumps tax returns

  3. Martin says:

    Are you serious with this comment, “a modest return on the wealth the state has helped produce for its millionaires”? The state doesn’t produce any income for anyone. The state taxes and spends.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.

ORANGE ALERT: The (almost) daily outrage

Wednesday, Apr 26 - "Aggressively begging foreign countries to funnel money straight into Trump's pocket is a clear violation of the Constitution's emoluments clause." -- Shripal Shah, vice president of American Bridge, a Democratic firm

We are all neighbors, not always neighborly

Wednesday, Apr 26 - In his letter to the editor Richard Squailia of West Stockbridge writes: “Part of a free and vibrant democracy is free speech and the right to talk to others peaceably in a public forum.”

Why I’m marching for science on Earth Day

Friday, Apr 21 - In his letter to the editor, Markes Johnson writes: “I am distressed that too many of our representatives in Washington, D.C., are willing to ignore scientific evidence when it conflicts with political ideology.”

Amend the proposed solar bylaw (Article 19) at town meeting

Thursday, Apr 20 - In their letter to the editor, Sharon Gregory, Patricia Ryan and Gabrielle Senza write: “If we allow roof-mounted systems ‘by right’ for accessory use and amend the definition for ‘light industrial’ to include ‘commercial solar installations,’ we would make great legal and green energy strides."

Ramsdell Library at risk — again

Monday, Apr 17 - In her letter to the editor, Holly Hamer writes: “A sharp reduction in hours (with a jumbled schedule that a spelling bee champion couldn't remember) will hasten the demise of this venerable community beacon.”