Airport owners again seek permission for controversial new hangars

More Info
By Thursday, Mar 30 News  9 Comments
Terry Cowgill
The Great Barrington Selectboard meeting room was packed Monday (March 27) during a hearing on whether to grant Berkshire Aviation permission to add three hangars to the Walter J. Koladza Airport. The matter was continued until May 15 when the hearing resumes.

Great Barrington — The owners of the Great Barrington airport continue to encounter headwinds in their quest to build three new hangars at the facility west of town on Route 71. It seems every time they appear before a town board or commission, new objections are raised by neighbors and others. Hearings have been continued as town officials review new material and discover murky legalities.

Such was the case Monday evening (March 27) as representatives from Berkshire Aviation went before the Select Board for the second time in an effort to secure a special permit to build the hangars and to justify the 86-year-old airport’s legal existence under a zoning code that was first enacted only two years after it was built.

A flag marks the location of the proposed hangars on the north side of the airport property.

A flag marks the location of the proposed hangars on the north side of the airport property.

In the standing-room-only selectmen’s room, Berkshire Aviation attorney Lori A. Robbins came forward with new information from town assessor Chris Lamarre and Fire Chief Charlie Burger. And there was a letter from the Southern Berkshire Chamber of Commerce extolling the airport’s virtues.

In response to complaints from neighbors that the new hangars would lower their property values, Robbins cited a letter from Lamarre that stated, “There is no discernable evidence leading me to conclude future real property values will be negatively impacted by such an occasion and to assert otherwise is speculation.”

Indeed, Lamarre added, many homes on Seekonk Cross Road and Egremont Plain Road, where the airport is located, have sold for a price in excess of their assessed value within the last three years.

Burger addressed the concerns some airport critics had about the storage and use of combustible and flammable substances on the property, adding that he “has no objection to the construction” and that “[the substances] are in small quantities and in compliance with state regulations regarding these materials.”

The self-serve fueling station at the airport.

The self-serve fueling station at the airport.

But Rich Dohoney, an attorney for airport neighbors Marc Fasteau and Anne Fredericks of 77 Seekonk Cross Road, had other ideas. He presented a list of proposed conditions that his clients would like to see attached to any special permit issued. (The text of these conditions is reproduced below.)

Among those conditions is that the runways not be lengthened (the owners have said this is impossible anyway, given the constraints of the property). Dohoney also listed limits on retail activities, including at the flight school and the aircraft repair business, limits on the number of aircraft housed at the airport (50), and restrictions on military helicopter activity (airport officials have said they have no control over this).

Dohoney also insisted there be no sales of leaded fuel on the property. As reported by The Edge last month, the Walter J. Koladza Airport, as the Great Barrington facility is known, sells leaded aviation fuel — or so-called “avgas” — at its self-serve pump.

Dohoney also offered an alternate interpretation of what the special permit, if approved, would allow the airport to do. He suggested one or two more special permits would be needed: one to codify the airport’s legal status; another for the proposed hangars; and yet another for the structures to be built in the town’s water quality protection zone.

“A yes or no vote on this does not authorize those hangars,” Dohoney said. “Nonconforming uses are a necessary evil but they are not to be encouraged or to grow.”

The airport maintenance building on Route 71.

The airport maintenance building on Route 71.

The airport was built before the town established its first zoning code in 1931. It is therefore a pre-existing nonconforming use and the site lies in an aquifer protection zone next to the Green River. Any expansion requires a special permit from the selectmen.

However, the zoning bylaws also require that an aviation field in a R-4 residential zone obtain a special permit, which the airport never was compelled to apply for because of its grandfathered status.

But the airport took the unusual step of voluntarily applying after the fact for the special permit, which includes the proposal to add the new hangars, “In order to quell any concerns about the legal status of use of the property as an airport,” Robbins said last month.

“In my opinion, if the [special permit] application were to be approved as proposed, it would include allowing the three hangars in the manner and the location proposed,” Town Planner Chris Rembold told this reporter. “They would also be subject to Planning Board site plan approval.”

Airport abutter Marc Fasteau addressing the Selectboard. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Airport abutter Marc Fasteau addressing the Selectboard. Photo: Terry Cowgill

As for property values, both Fasteau and Dohoney said they disagreed with the assessor, with Dohoney adding, “People bought their homes thinking it was a hobby airport.” This elicited laughter in the audience.

“What’s happened in the past is not a good measure of what would happen with three new hangars,” Fasteau insisted. “I respect our assessor but I disagree.”

Airport owner Rick Solan and manager Ken Krentza said the airport’s underground fuel tanks are scheduled to be replaced in August, as required every 20 years.

“To solve the problem, we are putting them in above-ground at a higher cost to preserve the land and not risk having fuel go into river,” Krentza said.

At one point, Solan got into a shouting match with Claudia Shapiro, an abutter who has sued Berkshire Aviation and the town multiple times and claims she actually owns part of the airport’s property. When Select Board Chairman Sean Stanton called for order and asked her to show some restraint, Shapiro mockingly urged him to call the police.

Airport owner Rick Solan responding to remarks by Claudia Shapiro. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Airport owner Rick Solan responding to remarks by Claudia Shapiro. Photo: Terry Cowgill

Michael Mah, a Pittsfield-based software engineer who keeps his plane in Pittsfield because Great Barrington doesn’t have indoor storage, warned of the alternative if Koladza were to close.

“I have two words as an alternative to the airport and that is Desisto School,” Mah said, referring to a massive hotel and residential resort planned for the former private school campus in Stockbridge.

“If [the airport] does not survive, we could be looking not at three hangars but hundreds of homes on 90 acres. It’s a large concern if the airport does not survive.”

In the end, the board asked Rembold to come up with a list of conditions to attach to the special permit application when the hearing continues on May 15 at 6:30 p.m. at Town Hall.

Text of the proposed conditions for a special permit, as presented to the Selectboard:

To: Town of Great Barrington

From: Donovan, O’Connor & Dodig LLP

Re: Application for Special Permit

       Berkshire Aviation Enterprises

Please accept the following as proposed conditions to be imposed on the Special Permit requested by Berkshire Aviation Enterprises, Inc. (“BAE”) for the property located at 70 Egremont Plain Road (the “Premises”).

  1. Any activity requiring a special permit under the Massachusetts Building Code shall be a material change to the Special Permit requiring approval pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws ch. 40A, Section 9 and Section 10.4 of the Zoning Ordinance.
  2. There shall be no increase in the length of the existing runway(s).
  3. The existing runways shall be reduced and/or reconfigured to provide a five hundred (500) foot runway safety area.
  4. There shall be no restaurants or food service conducted at he Premises.
  5. There shall no retail sales of any kind, including aircraft sales, at the Premises.
  6. There shall be no rental car business conducted at the Premises.
  7. The aircraft repair business shall be limited to one (1) mechanic.
  8. The flight school business shall be limited to four (4) instructors.
  9. There shall be no more than fifty (50) aircraft housed at the Premises.
  10. There shall be no helicopter operation at the Premises except: a) Helicopters used for emergency medical transport and b) United States military helicopters which shall be limited to six (6) days per year.
  11. Within six (6) months of issuance of the Special Permit and prior to the issuance of any building permits, BAE shall submit a Phase II Environmental Assessment conducted by a licensed site professional pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws ch. 21E to the Zoning Enforcement Officer.
  12. All existing subsurface surface sewage disposal systems at the Premises shall be fully compliant with Title 5 (310 CMR 15.000) and BAE shall file a Title 5 Official Inspection Form with “Passes” checked in Section “B. Certifications” to the Zoning Enforcement Officer by July 1, 2017.
  13. There shall be no sale of leaded fuel at the Premises.
  14. There shall be no underground storage takes [sic] at the Premises. All existing underground storage tanks shall be lawfully removed by September 1, 2017.
  15. All existing structures shall comply with the dimensional requirement of Section 9.2 of the Zoning Ordinance by January 1, 2018.

Return Home

9 Comments   Add Comment

  1. John says:

    NIMBYs will say anything at this point.

    Great Barrington Airpott is a wonderful small town airport and always will be. Let’s face it, if they wanted to expand the runway, they would not have sold the adjacent land a few years back
    Fasteau and Dahony speak nonsense . Most of the homes in the area were built before 1978 and are loaded with lead unless they have had a full EPA risk analysis and EPA lead abatement proceedures followed.. Look at yourself first before you lob one at your neighbor.
    Constructing a set of hangers is a no brainer to approve.

  2. John H Hart says:

    Desisto School indeed. Airport neighbors beware! There are developers out there keeping an eye on every large piece of property that could potentially go on the market. Careful what you wish for.
    John H.

  3. John says:

    It is very apparent that Mr Fasteau is clearly asking to close and destroy the Berkshire Aviation, in favor of expansive condominiums. Does Mr Fasteau have a financial interest in building condominiums?

  4. John H, Staber says:

    Those proposed restrictions are absolutely ridiculous. This is a successful business that has been located there since the 1940s and has contributed its share to the Great Barrington economy. I learned to fly there in 1963, became an instructor for them, flew charter for them; even worked in the shop when needed. It has always been a safe operation with plenty of concern for its neighbors. I would love to be able to watch airplanes from a nice deck cafe and have a hamburger. I would love to be able to hangar my own plane on the premises. The airport has always needed more hangar space. This whole world needs a good dose of tolerance with a healthy dose placed in the environs located around the Great Barrington Airport. Cudos go to those at the airport for keeping their cool and trying to do things in the proper manner. They are major asset to the area and deserve to remain so.

    1. John says:

      Fasteau is in the Luxury Hotel business. He is obviously trying to strangle the airport for his own profit…..

  5. Selma Hamilton says:

    I agree with John Staber. The Walter J. Koladza Airport and Berkshire Aviation Enterprises has been a friend and enhancement to the town of Great Barrington since Walt and Louise built it. Many have learned to fly there and many many private and commercial planes have had annual and 100 hour inspections done there. It is a well known airport and much loved by many pilots throughout the northeast; bringing retail business to Great Barrington’s shops, restaurants and hotels. Rich Solan and his partners have worked to continue the practice of being a friend and good neighbor to all the residents of Great Barrington, South Egremont and neighboring New York State. These hangers are long overdue and certainly will not detract from neighboring property values. There are upscale homes here that have over the years increased in value. The airport adds to the area; does not detract from it. Approval of this request can only enhance this. The Shapiros have been complaining since I can remember (at least since 1976) and use any chance for publicity.

    1. John says:

      Very well said Selma. The real danger lies with individuals developing a strategy to strangle it, with then motives to seize the land for their personal gain.

      Individuals complaining the most are in the Luxury Hotel Contruction business. Go ahead and google their names and what they are really up to in the background…

      1. Selma says:

        I so agree John. I did some research on these people…. In the past and current. They want to develop any piece of GB and the surrounding bucolic countryside that they can… anyone who has ever sat in the lawn chairs outside of the office at the airport knows the peace and serenity this place fosters. It would be a travesty to develop it into upscale condos or homes… a much greater risk to the green space of the Green River than the airport that has been there for nearly 70 years…

  6. Patrick Fennell says:

    Only in GB would people want to chase a successful and generous business out of town. Sad.

What's your opinion?

We welcome your comments and appreciate your respect for others. We kindly ask you to keep your comments as civil and focused as possible. If this is your first time leaving a comment on our website we will send you an email confirmation to validate your identity.

Egremonters reverse earlier vote, unanimously approve SBRSD budget

Friday, Jun 23 - Sixty Egremont residents, the minimum needed for a quorum, raised their pink slips in the cafeteria of Mount Everett Regional High School to cast their votes in favor of the proposed SBRSD budget, thereby ending the town's dispute with the school district -- for the time being.